The Ideal Primer ...for Production, Limited, and Open
#1
Posted 17 October 2009 - 08:00 PM
With primer shortages, I know there's a lot of the "I'll take whatever I can get" mentality right now... but IF whatever you wanted was available, what would you choose? Also, if you've experienced any particular issues (either too hard or too soft), please share!
Thanks,
#2
Posted 17 October 2009 - 08:24 PM
No feed problems in Dillon primer feeders.
CCI's at one time had problems in Dillons, but I think this is a thing of the distant past.
Federal are riding their name for some reason and I feel they are over priced without offering any real advantages.
Personally I would buy CCI, Federal, Win or Magtech whichever was cheapest. If Wolff are more than $2 per K cheaper I would buy them.
#3
Posted 17 October 2009 - 08:37 PM
Joe4d, on Oct 17 2009, 11:24 PM, said:
In striker-fired guns with lightened springs the slightly softer Fed primers are an advantage.
I've found that for 38SC Major loads I get a couple of extra loadings out of cases before the primer pockets get too loose...very slightly larger diameter. When the primer pockets are just a bit too loose for Win SP/SR, Fed SPM/SR will let me go a couple more times before I toss them.
I don't see any disadvantage to the Fed primers and they seem to be slightly more available right now. R,
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#5
Posted 18 October 2009 - 02:54 AM
G-ManBart, on Oct 17 2009, 08:37 PM, said:
Joe4d, on Oct 17 2009, 11:24 PM, said:
In striker-fired guns with lightened springs the slightly softer Fed primers are an advantage.
I've found that for 38SC Major loads I get a couple of extra loadings out of cases before the primer pockets get too loose...very slightly larger diameter. When the primer pockets are just a bit too loose for Win SP/SR, Fed SPM/SR will let me go a couple more times before I toss them.
I don't see any disadvantage to the Fed primers and they seem to be slightly more available right now. R,
This is more of an issue for 9 major (primer pockets). I have accumulated some Federals recently also, sounds like they'll work fine.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBoz1911 - comments welcome
#7
Posted 18 October 2009 - 06:48 AM
40 minor and major, 9mm major for open. No problems, and they are often easier to find than WSP.
For Revo and Single stack 45 I use Federals.
Noah Webster
TY46179 CRO
#9
Posted 19 October 2009 - 06:39 AM
Eagle Firearms Instruction LLC
TY-40734 CRO
NRA Pistol Instructor - Certified Glock Armorer
101st Airborne 1957-60 - US Air Force 1961-80 Retired
FIA C-12411 250 FF
#11
Posted 19 October 2009 - 08:50 AM
I didn't realize that so many were using Fed SP in their Production loads. And I'm also surprised that Win SP seems to be the predominant choice in Limited... I thought more folks were using Magnum and SR primers for major loads.
To those using Win SP or Federal SP-Magnum primers in Limited, have you experienced any issues with back flow, flattening, etc.? How about those using Win SP-Magnum or any Federal primers in Open?
#12
Posted 19 October 2009 - 04:03 PM
SQL> select * from users where clue > 0; no rows selected
#13
Posted 19 October 2009 - 07:47 PM
Xfactor, on Oct 19 2009, 11:50 AM, said:
I've used plenty of Win SP in my Limited and SS guns with no real problems at all...perfectly good choice. I've also used Fed SP and they would flatten a touch, but not bad.
I just recently got around to trying Fed SPM and SP in 38SC Major. The SP did flatten more than I'd like, but still were usable. The SPM are close to idea. Fed SR is about perfect in my guns and the SPM were very, very close to the FSR...not enough difference that you would notice without really looking to see it. I'm probably just going to buy a bunch of SPM when they're available again because I like them that much...I'd be happy using nothing but in 38SC from now on and they'd probably work fine in my M&P, Lim and SS guns as well. R,
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#14
Posted 20 October 2009 - 09:10 AM
G-ManBart, on Oct 19 2009, 10:47 PM, said:
Xfactor, on Oct 19 2009, 11:50 AM, said:
I've used plenty of Win SP in my Limited and SS guns with no real problems at all...perfectly good choice. I've also used Fed SP and they would flatten a touch, but not bad.
I just recently got around to trying Fed SPM and SP in 38SC Major. The SP did flatten more than I'd like, but still were usable. The SPM are close to idea. Fed SR is about perfect in my guns and the SPM were very, very close to the FSR...not enough difference that you would notice without really looking to see it. I'm probably just going to buy a bunch of SPM when they're available again because I like them that much...I'd be happy using nothing but in 38SC from now on and they'd probably work fine in my M&P, Lim and SS guns as well. R,
Thanks Bart. I've been doing a little more research on primers, and now I'm wondering how much of the old adage of Federal primers being the "softest" is actually due to a thinner/softer cup, versus the priming compound just being a bit more sensitive. Either way, it sounds like Federal SP-Mag and SR are both great choices for Limited and Open loads. Have you found Win SP-Mag to be about the same hardness/sensitivity as Fed SR, and Win SR to be harder than all 3?
#15
Posted 20 October 2009 - 09:22 AM
MoNsTeR, on Oct 20 2009, 03:03 AM, said:
Did not vote because the Wolfs I am using (older copper/gold color) are the ideal primer as far as performance (and particularly as far as cost). Have not tried the newer silver colored Wolf pistol primers so there is no evidence against Wolf as far as my experience.
Prior to Wolf, I used Federal.
"When one who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest." -anon.

March 2008
#17
Posted 21 October 2009 - 11:40 AM
ogiebb, on Oct 20 2009, 04:07 PM, said:
and Fed Sm rifle for major loads....
That's what I'm leaning toward too... although I have about 9k Fed SP-Mag primers that I'll probably also use for Limited major.
I've heard that the different brisance levels/flame durations can sometimes affect accuracy (depending on the powder, bullet, etc.); maybe one of these days I'll get around to testing various primer loads for groups.
#18
Posted 22 October 2009 - 03:28 PM
Xfactor, on Oct 20 2009, 12:10 PM, said:
I have wondered the same thing about Federal primers compared with the other brands as well. I guess it really wouldn't be too difficult to section a couple and see what difference, if any, there is in the cup material. Like most things, it's probably C) All of the above....slightly different thickness, hardness and priming compound sensitivity that all adds up.
I actually have never tried WSPM that I can recall....maybe, but it would have had to be years ago. I should have taken pics of primers as I did my comparisons because going off memory is only ballpark. The only things I'm pretty certain of about the primers in question would be that FSP's are the softest (duh!), WSR the hardest, FSR and FSPM are softer than WSR, and FSPM are just a touch softer than FSR. So, out of those it would go FSP, FSPM, FSR, WSR. WSP would probably go between FSP and FSPM as they looked similar to FSPM, but maybe a touch more flattening. I just eyeball that amount, but it's not too hard to compare them next to one another and be able to see which is softer. My guess is that WSPM would probably be pretty close to FSR if the trend is consistent. Now that I think of it, I probably have some of each in my brass bins that I can say for certain which primer was used....have to go look. R,
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#19
Posted 22 October 2009 - 07:22 PM
I have had nothing but outstanding luck with each and every round I have ever loaded using the Federal primers.
I can't say I've had that kind of reliability using a different primer (Winchester). I have had a couple of WSP primers go click and not bang with good hard hits on the primer. Now, I'm not saying Winchester primers suck,,,not at all. I have had good luck with them in fact (except for the two mentioned above) but that was over tens of thousands of rounds being fired off as well.
I have recently been forced to try the CCI primers and it remains to be seen if I like these or not.
Team Unholstered
L2504
Get to know HIM before HE pays you a visit......
Open: M, Limited: M
Prod: A, L-10: A, SS:A
My Youtube videos
#21
#22
Posted 27 October 2009 - 11:15 AM
gino_aki, on Oct 26 2009, 02:04 PM, said:
I think we sometimes forget that pushing a 180 or 200 with a really fast powder like N320, TG or Clays causes very high pressures. That's why there isn't even much, if any, loading data for those combos. Granted, we tend to load them long, which helps, but my normal .40 Major load with N320 and a 180 flattens primers pretty noticably and FSPs flatten pretty significantly. I still like them because they work great, but I'm not sure SPM might not really be "better" for such a high pressure combo. R,
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#23
Posted 13 December 2009 - 06:11 PM
USPSA: A67152
"Go hard today. Can’t worry about the past ‘cuz that was yesterday. I’m gonna put it on the ‘cuz its my time. Gotta stay on the grind ‘cuz its my time."
Quick, call dem Amber Lamps!
#24
Posted 21 December 2009 - 07:18 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote











