Anyone with experience converting 9mm to .38sa?
#1
Posted 15 October 2009 - 12:17 PM
#2
Posted 16 October 2009 - 07:29 PM
This post has been edited by mike NM: 16 October 2009 - 07:33 PM
#3
Posted 18 October 2009 - 08:37 PM
#4
Posted 19 October 2009 - 07:16 PM
Not sure why there would be magazine issues with the large frame. .38sa mags fit in the current large frame just like the 9x19 mags don't they? Are you possibly talking about magazine problems with the .38sa rim in general? I've had pretty good luck tuning those in 1911's (both ss and sv/sti). My ultimate goal is to have one that will feed both .38sa and 9x23 (which feeds like a champ in everything I've ever run it through) out of the same barrel if possible. I've done this on numerous 1911's, just trying to reproduce it with similar results in the Witness platform.
Thanks Jordan. I can't get anyone to give me a straight answer on if the Limited's cone barrel is the same as the Stock2 and all I would need to do is cut/recrown the barrel for the shorter slide. Any ideas if that would work?
#5
Posted 20 October 2009 - 12:47 PM
Another route you could take is get one of Briley's .38 Super barrels, have it cut down, and a cone fitted. You shouldn't have a problem with magazines as it's the 9mm ones that have problems.
Is there a reason you have your heart set on .38 Super?
#7
Posted 20 October 2009 - 01:45 PM
reaming the barrel to 38 super."
The chamber reamers available will not fit into polygonal rifling, the pilot diameter is too big. A custom reamer would have to be ground and you would have to find someone who will do it. I've talked to a couple companies and neither would take on the project. I even tried to get factory reamers with no luck.
Rich
www.canyoncreekcustom.comVisit My Website
Today is only yesterdays tomorrow. UH
#8
Posted 21 October 2009 - 06:15 PM
#9
Posted 22 October 2009 - 04:33 AM
mike NM, on Oct 21 2009, 09:15 PM, said:
Mike, I'm certainly no expert but I believe the large frame guns in 9mm will also accept the .38sa mags without modifications...just as they would .45ACP, .40/10mm and be perfectly functional with an upper change. Other than minor tweaking of each mag, why would I have trouble getting mags to work? These would be factory mags and from what I've read, seem to be pretty reliable. Is there something inherent in the .38SA mags that make them problematic?
I talked to EAA yesterday and they will not import the Tanfoglio Stock II in .38SA (one is available according to the Tanfoglio website) nor would they import it's cone bbl for me to use in a 9mm gun. Jordan, you are spot on there about the Limited I hadn't thought of that until you posted. I tried to find out if the Limited bbl would work cut down but they shot that down immediately (though wouldn't tell me why other than "no"). Although the young lady that answered the phone was pleasant and tried to get me answers from someone more knowledgeable (she said she had only been there a couple of weeks), the "relayed" answers to my questions were abrupt to say the least. I never actually got to talk to anyone who really knew what I was asking. I understand now what many have said about customer no-service. I'm left with finding a Stock II in 9mm and adding a cone to a standard .38SA barrel or just sticking with the Match in .38SA. I would have done that already but can't find any in that caliber so it looks like I'll be getting one in .45ACP and then just buying a separate upper in .38SA. It was worth a try anyway.
#10
Posted 23 October 2009 - 07:24 AM
"Let me give you a piece of advice. When you get old, never trust a fart."- The Bucket List

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote
