Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!: Classifier scores same between divisions? - Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Classifier scores same between divisions?

#1 User is offline   leam 

  • Sees Sights Lift
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 11-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Albany, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 04:20 PM

If I shoot a classifier in SS/Major and get my usual 30-somthing %, would my score be the same if I were classed as Open/Major? That is, are the score values related to Division?

Leam
"Tears are the sweat of our humanity at work." --lh

LinkedIn

#2 User is offline   ima45dv8 

  • Jurassic Mark
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 7,767
  • Joined: 04-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newnan, GA

Posted 06 July 2009 - 04:27 PM

Not necessarily. Depends on the particular classifier.
Go to the Classifier Calculator and plug in the same hit factor for a given classifier using different divisions.
Speed IS a tactic (and a pretty damn good one, too! )
"Think you can, think you can't: either way you're right." -- Henry Ford

Shhhh.... Please don't tell my Mom I'm a DRL. She thinks I'm still a piano player in a cathouse.

#3 User is online   steel1212 

  • I see what you did there!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 5,055
  • Joined: 17-June 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Frankfort, Ky

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:05 PM

The only ones that are the same or similar are Limited/L10/SS. A lot of, but not all, L10 HHF are based off of Limited. They based the SS HHF off of L10 until more classifiers are entered.
Rudy Project USA Shooting Team
Corey Estill
USPSA: A-57351
IDPA: A26629
My youtube videos

DVC is a three legged stool. Remove one leg and you're just left with a pile of sticks.

#4 User is offline   leam 

  • Sees Sights Lift
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 11-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Albany, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:31 PM

View Postima45dv8, on Jul 6 2009, 07:27 PM, said:

Not necessarily. Depends on the particular classifier.
Go to the Classifier Calculator and plug in the same hit factor for a given classifier using different divisions.


Two quick tests: CM08-06 and CM99-14, using a HF of 35.0, gave the same results within 0.0001% for Production, Open, Revolver, and SS. Using CM99-14 with a HF or 80 made the difference a little wider, 0.0005% or so. So perhaps at the M/GM level there would be a difference. At my level, not really.

I have half a mind (on a good day) to just start shooting Open with my Single stack. Given that I generally grace the bottom of the competitor list anyway, at least I could get enough scores reported to get classified. I could also fix up my gun however I wanted and wouldn't ahve to worry about what Division I'm in. :)

Leam
"Tears are the sweat of our humanity at work." --lh

LinkedIn

#5 User is offline   g34 

  • Finally read the FAQs
  • PipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 26-April 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Louisiana

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:36 PM

View Postleam, on Jul 6 2009, 06:31 PM, said:

View Postima45dv8, on Jul 6 2009, 07:27 PM, said:

Not necessarily. Depends on the particular classifier.
Go to the Classifier Calculator and plug in the same hit factor for a given classifier using different divisions.


Two quick tests: CM08-06 and CM99-14, using a HF of 35.0, gave the same results within 0.0001% for Production, Open, Revolver, and SS. Using CM99-14 with a HF or 80 made the difference a little wider, 0.0005% or so. So perhaps at the M/GM level there would be a difference. At my level, not really.

I have half a mind (on a good day) to just start shooting Open with my Single stack. Given that I generally grace the bottom of the competitor list anyway, at least I could get enough scores reported to get classified. I could also fix up my gun however I wanted and wouldn't ahve to worry about what Division I'm in. :)

Leam


I might be reading this wrong, but how is it possible to get a hit factor of 35 or 80?

#6 User is offline   leam 

  • Sees Sights Lift
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 11-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Albany, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:38 PM

View Postg34, on Jul 6 2009, 08:36 PM, said:

I might be reading this wrong, but how is it possible to get a hit factor of 35 or 80?


Easy, have someone new tothe sport make up unmbers to put into the calculator! :)

What would be some better numbers? For my use, I'm a D grade shooter so what might be appropriate entries for that?

Leam
"Tears are the sweat of our humanity at work." --lh

LinkedIn

#7 User is offline   boz1911 

  • GM in probation division...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 3,368
  • Joined: 07-January 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peachtree City, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:40 PM

View Postleam, on Jul 6 2009, 06:38 PM, said:

View Postg34, on Jul 6 2009, 08:36 PM, said:

I might be reading this wrong, but how is it possible to get a hit factor of 35 or 80?


Easy, have someone new tothe sport make up unmbers to put into the calculator! :)

What would be some better numbers? For my use, I'm a D grade shooter so what might be appropriate entries for that?

Leam



Except for fixed time classifiers try a HF of 5.0. There are no HF's lower tham that, at least in open division.
TY54309 Team Swiss Cake Rolls
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBoz1911 - comments welcome


#8 User is offline   leam 

  • Sees Sights Lift
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 11-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Albany, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 05:50 PM

View Postboz1911, on Jul 6 2009, 08:40 PM, said:

Except for fixed time classifiers try a HF of 5.0. There are no HF's lower tham that, at least in open division.


CM08-06 and CM99-14, using a HF of 5.0, gave the same results within 0.0001% for Production, Open, Revolver, and SS.

I'm open to the concept of "operator error", but not sure how to identify it. My usual classifier scores are in the low-mid 30's which is why I chose 35.0 before. It came up with a percentage of just under 39%.

Leam
"Tears are the sweat of our humanity at work." --lh

LinkedIn

#9 User is offline   boz1911 

  • GM in probation division...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 3,368
  • Joined: 07-January 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peachtree City, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 06:14 PM

View Postleam, on Jul 6 2009, 05:50 PM, said:

View Postboz1911, on Jul 6 2009, 08:40 PM, said:

Except for fixed time classifiers try a HF of 5.0. There are no HF's lower tham that, at least in open division.


CM08-06 and CM99-14, using a HF of 5.0, gave the same results within 0.0001% for Production, Open, Revolver, and SS.

I'm open to the concept of "operator error", but not sure how to identify it. My usual classifier scores are in the low-mid 30's which is why I chose 35.0 before. It came up with a percentage of just under 39%.

Leam



Those are fixed time classifiers, hence 100% will be all the available points in the alotted time. Ex: 100 points available and you get 35ponts, your % will be 35%.

For all non fixed time classifiers use the hit factor and you will get your percentage.
TY54309 Team Swiss Cake Rolls
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBoz1911 - comments welcome


#10 User is offline   leam 

  • Sees Sights Lift
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 11-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Albany, Georgia

Posted 06 July 2009 - 06:20 PM

View Postboz1911, on Jul 6 2009, 09:14 PM, said:

Those are fixed time classifiers, hence 100% will be all the available points in the alotted time. Ex: 100 points available and you get 35ponts, your % will be 35%.

For all non fixed time classifiers use the hit factor and you will get your percentage.


Okay, using some of the classifiers I have on record I'd lose ~5% going from SS to Open. Not that big a deal when you're at the 30% range. :)

Thanks!

Leam

This post has been edited by leam: 06 July 2009 - 06:30 PM

"Tears are the sweat of our humanity at work." --lh

LinkedIn

#11 User is offline   aztecdriver 

  • Finally read the FAQs
  • PipPip
  • Group: Classified
  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: 20-April 09

Posted 08 July 2009 - 08:09 PM

View Postleam, on Jul 6 2009, 09:20 PM, said:

View Postboz1911, on Jul 6 2009, 09:14 PM, said:

Those are fixed time classifiers, hence 100% will be all the available points in the alotted time. Ex: 100 points available and you get 35ponts, your % will be 35%.

For all non fixed time classifiers use the hit factor and you will get your percentage.


Okay, using some of the classifiers I have on record I'd lose ~5% going from SS to Open. Not that big a deal when you're at the 30% range. :)

Thanks!

Leam


Leam,

Not to discourage you - do what you want - but I've noticed while classifiers and standards test just those things - competing with a single stack gun in open would be - delicately stated - painful on field courses. If you really want to get some open scores in, by all means - shoot a second classifier and pay the $3.00 or whatever the cost is for submitting an extra classifier. I did that with my production rig - and just reshot for limited minor. I would think, though, that shooting an entire match(s) against the open crowd with 30 rnd sticks, comps, and dots would be less fun.

If your goal is more scores - shoot the match SS - and submit a second classifier run in open, where the club permits it.
Proud Member USPSA: TY63364 Limited C, Single Stack C, Production B
Thinking about applying to DRL school--- someone tell me to run.... but still looking for someone that wants me on a team :)

Me: "Hey CHECK THAT OUT!! It's a Perfect Double!" RO - after shaking head and staring at the hole for 10 seconds "Alpha Mike" -- Me: "Made ya' look..."

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users