Beretta 92FS Lock-Block Need'n input on lock block breakage
#1
Posted 24 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
Another question that I would like to throw in concerns replacing the broken lock block. I can get a block from Beretta with no problems but I am concerned with mechanical complications that I should watch for when installing a new unworn part into a worn mechinism.
Any input on this matter will be appreciated.
Thanks !!
#2
Posted 24 May 2009 - 07:35 PM
#4
Posted 24 May 2009 - 08:09 PM
I just stuck the new one in.. and I'm far from a gunsmith.. runs fine.
Turangi!
#5
Posted 25 May 2009 - 03:46 AM
There are different generations of locking blocks - the newer ones are better (they say). Through many thousands of rounds and many Berettas, I've never broken one.
Look at your old one and use it as a guide. Lube all of the old block's shiny spots on the new one.
#6
Posted 25 May 2009 - 04:50 PM
I remember reading....somewhere...that the locking block is a "consumable" like a recoil spring, and that the typical life was 10k rds. I cannot remember where I read that. I want to say it was a DoD publication.
PM Sent also
FY42385
#7
Posted 26 May 2009 - 04:20 PM
I recommend replacing the plunger at the same time (there are several generations of blocks and I believe the cam surfaces are different between some of them). Buy a second set to keep in the range bag to ward off evil spirits.
W/ NATO rounds, the life expectancy for the mil contracts is supposed to be somewhere around 20k, iirc.
-rvb
#8
Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:41 PM
Back then (1995) I'd heard of locking blocks breaking pretty commonly.
kc
Being unconquerable lies within yourself - Sun-Tzu
#9
Posted 01 June 2009 - 08:32 AM
From what I recall talking to Ernie Langdon, but the time they got to the 4th gen blocks, the blocks were indestructible.
#12
Posted 11 June 2009 - 05:29 AM
What sunk in for Beretta was that while Glock were offering total system upgrades for what seemed like pennies, Beretta were telling 92/96 system users that they would be winding down support and service for the model in favour of te newer product lines.....
Our Glock LEO distributer told me Beretta was his best salesman...
The local PD told me on average, the 96d's were puking locking blocks before 10k.
#13
Posted 11 August 2009 - 01:11 PM
I remember the locking blocks in the early-90s would break and Beretta's research concluded that it was the 90-degree corners where the "ears" begin was the culprit. No radius meant that you had a definite stress riser.
They changed the design in the mid-90s and went to a block that had radiused corners. I have personally never seen one of those break, but I reckon that there are some out there after reading this thread.
Master Instructor
College Park (GA) Police Dept.
"Those who live by the sword...are probably pretty f***ing good at it" - me
"Bravo/Delta, 2 Mike, 4 No-Shoots, 4 Extra Shots......Real Life really IS Virginia Count". - me, on the scene of an actual self-defense shooting in my jurisdiction
"You can get a man to blow himself up with the promise of 72 doe-eyed virgins waiting for him in heaven. You could NEVER get a woman to blow herself up with the promise of 72 inexperienced Abercrombie & Fitch models."
#15
Posted 20 September 2009 - 09:01 AM
the other thing that used to go on the 92F's was the trigger return spring
in reading the othr posts i guess they have made strides in trying to correct the locking block failure problem, least the rounds between failure are more it sounds like....
#16
Posted 21 September 2009 - 10:09 AM
Cosmetically it looks pretty bad....and I have had the trijicon replaced once.
It was a new model when I got it....and took me a long time to break the locking block....a bunch of rounds. I do know...as mentioned, there was a problem with the locing blocks but Beretta fixed it. At least that is what I am told. I know it is a "go to gun" for me...trust it that much.
#18
Posted 21 September 2009 - 01:10 PM
#19
Posted 27 December 2009 - 11:40 AM
SA Friday, on Sep 21 2009, 01:10 PM, said:
New or not they do crack eventually. It's not that big a deal. Just replace it when it happens. The newer slide though definately is a must, the old one(very unlikely that anyone still has it) is the one that was having all the problems.
#20
Posted 29 December 2009 - 06:27 AM
will marshall, on Dec 27 2009, 12:40 PM, said:
SA Friday, on Sep 21 2009, 01:10 PM, said:
New or not they do crack eventually. It's not that big a deal. Just replace it when it happens. The newer slide though definately is a must, the old one(very unlikely that anyone still has it) is the one that was having all the problems.
It wasn't the 'old style' slide that was a problem, it was the French manufactured slide blanks that used Tellurium in the alloy that was the problem. The standard F slides are still in use by many of us.

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote





