(1) Another local already had one, and it worked all the time. Period. Was clearly the least sensitive to lighting conditions out of all the ones I've seen. This includes nearly everything except the CED M2. No experience there.
(2) I heard the indoor light system actually works, from someone who posted here on BE. And it was only $30ish, versus the vastly more expensive CED infrared setup.
So I bought one.
First thing I did when it arrived was to setup the indoor skyscreens (overpriced sheet of white cardboard and a fish tank bulb) and shoot a rubber band across it. Bam - 53 FPS. Sweet.
So I've owned it about 2 months now, and it's only failed to pick up a projectile 2 or 3 times out of at least 500 pistol rounds, 50-75 from rifles, 4 arrows, and about 25 rubber bands - My wife's dad and brother are big bowhunters ,and it clocked their bows at 231/232fps, and 279/281fps respectively. Expensive bows appear to have low standard deviations.
Most importantly, the indoor lighting setup works great. My data is very agreeable to the same batch of ammo run over the machine on a good overcast day, and it also tracks nicely with every other chrono we've parked it next to - except for a fairly bright day where the numbers were still about right over the ProChrono, but a Shooting Chrony was going nuts, and reading 129PF loads at somewhere between 600-630fps.
In other words, I like it.
Here's a couple pics from the indoor range at an IDPA match, just before we clocked at least 10 shooters with it. You can see it's a pretty simple setup. Just a pair of cardboard baffles that angle the diffused light down into the sensors, without any way for them to see the bulb directly.
Attached File(s)
-
IMG_1723.jpg (98.99K)
Number of downloads: 84 -
IMG_1724.jpg (68.47K)
Number of downloads: 71 -
IMG_1728.jpg (121.88K)
Number of downloads: 78 -
IMG_1726.jpg (128.96K)
Number of downloads: 59
This post has been edited by MemphisMechanic: 23 April 2009 - 05:34 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

