Why .40?
#1
Posted 12 April 2009 - 06:49 AM
If this is true why are so many Limited guns chambered for .40 and it seems to be a popular round for competition?
#2
Posted 12 April 2009 - 06:55 AM
WmCF, on Apr 12 2009, 08:49 AM, said:
If this is true why are so many Limited guns chambered for .40 and it seems to be a popular round for competition?
.40 is the minimum caliber, and the mag holds more rounds than .45.
Less mag changes = quicker times.
#4
Posted 12 April 2009 - 07:34 AM
Jim
...she can't handle cop cars or taxi-cabs yet. But she can wear the hell out of a bikini.
#5
Posted 12 April 2009 - 07:38 AM
What you are hearing about there is mostly due to bullet weight. 40 guns typically run bullets that weigh either 165g, 180, or 200g...180g being the most popular. 45 guns typically run 200g or 230g (though some run 185g or so).
Loaded to the same Power Factor*, a heavier bullet will give a more "lazy and rolling" recoil feel. While a lighter bullet will have the gun recoil a bit more...well...snappy.
Probably 90% of the Limited shooter run a 40. And, 85% of those run them with 180g bullets. They work...well.
* Power Factor is a bullets velocity multiplied by it's weight (and then divided by 1,000 just to make the numbers look simple). For instance, our sport requires that a load makes 165+ Power Factor to be considered for Major scoring.
A 180g bullet would need to be going at a speed of 917 feet per second (fps) to make Major ( 180 x 917 = 165060, divide by 1,000 and you get 165.060). A 200g bullet would need to be going 825fps...
Keep our city clean and safe. Do your part.
#6
Posted 12 April 2009 - 07:46 AM
#7
Posted 12 April 2009 - 08:04 AM
lugnut, on Apr 12 2009, 07:46 AM, said:
+1
99% of my shooting is done with a .45acp, but I've tried a variety of bullet weights in that caliber and can attest to this statement. Once the adrenaline is flowing under the clock, I can't tell the difference between my 172pf 200 grainers or my 185pf 230 grainers. It's just going bang, and I'm just aiming.
#8
Posted 12 April 2009 - 08:13 AM
BK
#9
Posted 12 April 2009 - 10:37 AM
Shoot a typical Limited gun in .40 with decent handloads or competition specific ammo (like Atlanta Arms) and there's pretty much no way you're going to think they feel snappy. I've let people at work try mine and they all say it feels like a pop gun.
Most of the folks talking about "snappy .40s" are comparing single stacks and even there the difference is very minor. My wife is quite petite (size 2) and she put about 250 rounds of .40 major through my single stack the last time we shot together....no way it's snappy if she can shoot that much without a problem (has tiny hands too).
Try one, you'll like it
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#10
Posted 12 April 2009 - 12:45 PM
I had pretty much decided on an STI 2011 in .40 but read a bunch of posts on other forums by people hating the .40 round. I'm new to this and still learning and I appreciate all the informative replies.
True that as soon as the match timer goes off I tend never to notice the recoil..........
Cheers.
#12
Posted 12 April 2009 - 03:53 PM
fourtrax, on Apr 12 2009, 06:49 PM, said:
For practical shooting there is no "Other forums". Ask your questions here and get answers from some of the best shooters in the world.
With that being said, get a STI in .40. If your worried about the recoil get a edge with some heavy parts and as you shoot more and more your more than likely to trim away the fat and have a light gun. I started out with a para and a tungsten guide rod=HEAVY! My current STI eagle probably weighs in around 34-35oz or so if I had to guess.
Corey Estill
USPSA: A-57351
IDPA: A26629
My youtube videos
DVC is a three legged stool. Remove one leg and you're just left with a pile of sticks.
#13
Posted 12 April 2009 - 09:02 PM
Folks here don't just shoot or test or break guns; they wear 'em out.
"Think you can, think you can't: either way you're right." -- Henry Ford
Shhhh.... Please don't tell my Mom I'm a DRL. She thinks I'm still a piano player in a cathouse.
#14
Posted 12 April 2009 - 10:34 PM
ima45dv8, on Apr 12 2009, 10:02 PM, said:
Oh, you just had to go and write that
Edit cause I can't type tonight!
This post has been edited by G-ManBart: 12 April 2009 - 10:35 PM
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#15
Posted 13 April 2009 - 07:30 AM
Upon further reflection I realize my question was a little silly. I could have asked, "many if not most experienced Limited shooters use .40 but some less experienced shooters have told me they don't like it; should I be concerned?"
Pardon me, but I'm a new shooter.
Cheers.
#17
Posted 08 June 2009 - 09:23 PM
#18
Posted 09 June 2009 - 05:01 AM
Because .40 is so popular, you can find a wealth of information on formulas for loads for almost any gun in common use and a wealth of information on tuning that gun as well.
“Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.”, Groucho Marx (1890 - 1977)
#20
Posted 19 July 2009 - 03:04 PM
STI Trubor 38 Super
(2) Springfield P9 Factory comps
Springfield Trophy Match
Colt Python 6"
#21
Posted 19 July 2009 - 06:13 PM
#24
Posted 06 December 2009 - 06:46 AM
You need to ak your self that when getting answers to a question, many novices to shooting or shooting sports assume all shooting is the same or assume someone with experience in one aspect of shooting is an expert on all aspects. There are alot of good shooters out that that have never competed so really have no idea what makes a good limited gun or not, unfortunately these people wont admit they are clueless and spout out there opinions like they are the gospel. A little advice, if you are looking for gun recommendations ask people that actually do what you want to do.
#25
Posted 11 December 2009 - 01:01 AM
My Hands are Like a Vise....that probably explains why I shoot so bad

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote












