Recognizing Speed stage or points stage? What do you do?
#2
Posted 23 March 2009 - 11:39 AM
However, if all of the targets are covered up in hard cover and no shoots, then I'm shooting points....
It's all a balance, and it just takes some time/experience for you to discover what suits you the best.
#3
Posted 24 March 2009 - 12:29 PM
If I have a bunch of targets close together, no movement, its going to come down to speed, A fast draw and fast transisitons, I won't mind dropping some C's inorder to hose the stage.
Add NS to the same stage and I will aim away from the NS into C zone to keep the speed up. I'll take a hit on Points to prevent a NS but keep the speed high to force other to shoot at the same pace and risk a NS while trying for A's
Anything over a HF of 12. the emphasis will be on speed. Most stand a hose stages, some classifiers, almost never a field stages
Now if there is some movement. even with open targets, (the movement will eat into the HF), points are huge, especially since you know the other guy will get a A's.
I'm going to try to make up time on movement, but still keep my A's
If I see a NS that has been hit alot, then I will definately back off the speed to prevent hitting it, the HF savings (time is would cost) on not hitting a NS is huge
See how fast other shooters are going, how fast you think you are going to go. If you still can't tell what kind of stage it is, shoot all A's as fast as you can
#4
Posted 24 March 2009 - 01:47 PM
#5
Posted 24 March 2009 - 01:54 PM
Supermoto, on Mar 24 2009, 03:29 PM, said:
I bet that would work....
Corey Estill
USPSA: A-57351
IDPA: A26629
My youtube videos
DVC is a three legged stool. Remove one leg and you're just left with a pile of sticks.
#6
Posted 24 March 2009 - 03:56 PM
#8
Posted 24 March 2009 - 11:21 PM
Even stages with a high hit factor are going to be won by someone shooting a very high percentage of the available points.
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
"I found the key to life; the lock was broken"
#10
Posted 25 March 2009 - 06:57 AM
I have managed to do this twice at big matches and both times won my class by a good margin and shot out of my class in the overall standings.
When I do this at local matches, my finish is very good as well.
Thanks Manny
A friend of mine told me "Your work has really made you cynical" my reply was "Cynical.....I passed cynical five years ago....I now live in reality"
Considering the amount of fancy equipment now seen in competition, some readers have complained loudly that the 'average guy' does not have a chance. It might be pointed out that this average guy never has had a chance. Competition is held to determine what is best, not what is average. And if all the equipment were standardized, the man who won would still not be in any sense average.
The Mondays
#11
Posted 25 March 2009 - 09:50 AM
WWJWD? "What would John Wayne do?"
Keith Wright
Match Director- Sin City Shooters, www.sincityshooters.org
#12
Posted 25 March 2009 - 10:33 AM
Good Luck
#13
Posted 25 March 2009 - 10:48 AM
I feel that there are no stages where it is acceptable to throw away points if favor of speed. The hard-won lesson I try to keep top of mind is the the 95% rule. When I forget that rule and just try and hose the close and dirty stuff I pretty much always crash and burn. So always shoot for points, but get out of your own way and let your visual feed-back tell you how fast you can acquire them on any given shot.
#14
Posted 25 March 2009 - 10:56 AM
on long stages it is possible to make up stage/match points by running a faster time at the sacrifice of a few points on paper..
but equally on short stages you can give a LOT of match points away. ( on a 60 point stage.. stay in the pack..you may give up only 1 or 2 stage points..but you shoot 3 Ds and 4 Cs and fast time..you might end up giving away 10-15 stage points )
shoot points..shoot smooth..shoot assertive
Live Positively -- Diet Coke
See Everything -- B.E.
#15
Posted 25 March 2009 - 11:41 AM
#16
Posted 25 March 2009 - 06:05 PM
smokshwn, on Mar 25 2009, 06:57 AM, said:
95% of the available points or 95% Alphas? I think shooting 95% Alphas would slow you down too much to be competitive.
#17
Posted 26 March 2009 - 03:40 PM
badchad, on Mar 25 2009, 07:05 PM, said:
smokshwn, on Mar 25 2009, 06:57 AM, said:
95% of the available points or 95% Alphas? I think shooting 95% Alphas would slow you down too much to be competitive.
The way I took and have applied it is 95% alphas.... yes there are going to be a few targets where you purposefully shoot a c/d on a partial but those targets should go in your 5%. I think the key factor is that if the Alpha is presented (open target) then many will drop points "trying" to be faster on it taking the time to see the A and call the shot. Kind of the same concept of those draws where you try to be fast and are slow vs. those draws where you simply draw and wind up surprising yourself with the time.
I remember during the class when we discussed the concept thinking that it would slow you down too much, however like I said everytime I have achieved it, the match result has spoken for itself.
Personally at times I can feel myself shooting at a pace that I perceive is slower than I am capable of, however on looking at some video and looking at results I can see that I am actually shooting at a pace where I am making far fewer mistakes and/or compensating for a less than ideal shooting platform far fewer times than trying to be fast. All in all I think the result is as Stuart said above, you shoot more smoothly and therefor the results speak for themselves.
A friend of mine told me "Your work has really made you cynical" my reply was "Cynical.....I passed cynical five years ago....I now live in reality"
Considering the amount of fancy equipment now seen in competition, some readers have complained loudly that the 'average guy' does not have a chance. It might be pointed out that this average guy never has had a chance. Competition is held to determine what is best, not what is average. And if all the equipment were standardized, the man who won would still not be in any sense average.
The Mondays
#18
Posted 26 March 2009 - 03:49 PM
#19
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:07 PM
smokshwn, on Mar 26 2009, 03:40 PM, said:
I think 95% of alphas is just unrealistic. If you look at the what wins Nationals or the World Shoot, nobody is shooting 95% alphas and nobody is even very close. You mentioned Manny, and if your referring to Bragg, I had a private lesson with him earlier this year (which was awesome BTW) and when he's talking about 95% I'm all but certain he's talking about points not Alphas. We talked about this at length and I took detailed notes.
#20
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:52 PM
badchad, on Mar 26 2009, 06:07 PM, said:
smokshwn, on Mar 26 2009, 03:40 PM, said:
I think 95% of alphas is just unrealistic. If you look at the what wins Nationals or the World Shoot, nobody is shooting 95% alphas and nobody is even very close. You mentioned Manny, and if your referring to Bragg, I had a private lesson with him earlier this year (which was awesome BTW) and when he's talking about 95% I'm all but certain he's talking about points not Alphas. We talked about this at length and I took detailed notes.
+1
Eric G. shot 87.6% (483 / 551) Alphas ,but shot 96% of available points at the last WS.
IPSC is scored points AND time for a reason.
This post has been edited by edwin garcia: 26 March 2009 - 04:52 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote












