Electronic hearing protection Which do you own and why?
#1
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:44 AM
Right now I own a set of Radians and a set of Howard Leight Electronic Sport Earmuffs.
So far all I am shooting is USPSA and Long Range Tactical .308 matches
I want feed back from people about their muffs and if you have experience with either of the 2 muffs I have listed how yours compare to mine. Thanks .. K
Review:
Howard Leight Electronic Sport Earmuffs
Plus: Low profile
Cons: -These do not cut off the sound soon enough when shooting near a 300 win mag .. and if they have a muzzle brake .. forget it.
- I would never dream of using these indoors
- I would not buy these again
Radians Pro-Amp Electronic
Plus: - Cutoff the sound at least 30% better than the Howard Leight (my guess)
- Each ear can be independently adjusted
Cons: -More expensive
- not as low a profile
They are more expensive for a reason .. they work better.. these were a Christmas gift from my wife but she liked them and took them...
If no one comes up with a better pair of headsets I'm going to buy another pair of the Radians ..
#2
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:09 AM
The nice thing is that they don't just cut off when there's noise, they reduce all noise above 70db and increases all sound below to 70db. Its a very nice, even sound. They're also substantially more comfortable than the peltors. The ears conform better around glasses and the headband is soft.
Prior to shooting USPSA, I shot a lot of sporting clays, typically with just plugs. I shot my first Clays match with the Pro Ears last weekend and was pleasantly surprised at how nice the Pro Ears were for clays. Sound quality was very even and I could have a conversation during shooting.
#3
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:29 AM
This post has been edited by LPatterson: 20 February 2009 - 08:29 AM
Eagle Firearms Instruction LLC
TY-40734 CRO
NRA Pistol Instructor - Certified Glock Armorer
101st Airborne 1957-60 - US Air Force 1961-80 Retired
FIA C-12411 250 FF
#4
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:08 AM
'While other brands say they have 'compression' technology, they do not. What they do have is outdated technology, either 'Peak Clipping' or 'Automatic Level Control'. 'Peak Clipping' turns the amplification system off when noise levels reach a preset decibel leaving the wearer with passive muffs. 'ALC' simply reacts to high noise levels by lowering the unit's volume so the louder sounds still drown out softer sounds. In both technologies loud noise levels compromise the ability to hear quieter sounds. Only Ridgeline's 'DLSC' technology protects hearing while at the same time allowing the wearer to hear lower volume sounds such as normal conversation. 'DLSC' works by instantly 'compressing' all noises over the 70 dB threshold by 50% to a safe level while amplifying all sounds below that to 70 dB.'
#5
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:40 AM
As mentioned the way they handle the sound is much smoother, they don't "cut out" and then turn back on like the peltors do. They just simply don't let anything beyond a certain volume through. This is nice, but I would still have purchased them without it.
Don't cheap out on muffs. Look at it like an investment in your health. The price is painful up front but is likely to be worse later, so suck it up and spend the cash now. I sleep better at night knowing I'm doing everything I reasonably can to protect my hearing.
The Pro Ears are a little too big for rifle/shotgun use. I switch to plugs for those. I'm not that big into 3-gun (yet) so it's not that much of an issue for me.
This post has been edited by DarthMuffin: 20 February 2009 - 09:45 AM
#9
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:31 AM
US Army 1SG Retired
1979-2000
19Z50
TY-64885
RO June 2009
#10
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:38 AM
Dillon Pro----Lightweight, uses compression, takes AAA batteries
Con---small earcups, sweaty in hot weather. Earcups crack
quickly, I'm on the third set. They bump the stock
and don't work as well with a rifle and shotgun.
Pro-Ear Predator 300's
Pro-----Works well with rifle/shotgun. Compression technology.
Con---Uses EXPENSIVE N batteries. Knobs turn very easily,
I killed a couple of sets of batteries before I pulled the
knobs and tossed them. I probably use these twice
as much as the dillons.
Also have a pair of Howard Leights, and a cheapy pair from Wally world.
Neither one impresses me much, especially with an open gun.
Noah Webster
TY46179 CRO
#11
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:39 AM
“Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.”, Groucho Marx (1890 - 1977)
#13
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:27 AM
#14
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:34 AM
sandman78, on Feb 20 2009, 12:31 PM, said:
I'm thinking you're confused. Perhaps they reduce BY 20db, but I don't think they could reduce TO 20 db. A whisper in a library is rated at 30db with normal conversation running 60 to 70db.
#15
Posted 20 February 2009 - 12:13 PM
it also take aaa batteries so I bought rechargable ones and never worry about getting batts. use to have
other electronic ears and the battery at radio shack cost me some serious$$
#16
Posted 20 February 2009 - 12:30 PM
Radians
[attachment=22512:224.jpg]
Dillon HP1
[attachment=22513:10157_m.jpg]
Radians Pro Amp works for me.
BK
This post has been edited by bkeeler: 20 February 2009 - 12:42 PM
#17
Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:50 PM
Thought they were to heavy and went back to my plugs or regular muffs.
So dont look so dam smug.
No matter where you go there you are.
Strong Opinions Unencumbered By Facts
Team Scooter
#18
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:24 PM
Tom S., on Feb 20 2009, 01:34 PM, said:
sandman78, on Feb 20 2009, 12:31 PM, said:
I'm thinking you're confused. Perhaps they reduce BY 20db, but I don't think they could reduce TO 20 db. A whisper in a library is rated at 30db with normal conversation running 60 to 70db.
I am sure you are right. but all I know is the echos are louder than the round going off.
US Army 1SG Retired
1979-2000
19Z50
TY-64885
RO June 2009
#19
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:33 PM
norbs007, on Feb 20 2009, 10:27 AM, said:
Me too. I tried everything else and thought some were good until I tried the Sordin.
Scott Springer e-mail me here
My Facebook
#20
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:37 PM
Tom S., on Feb 20 2009, 01:34 PM, said:
sandman78, on Feb 20 2009, 12:31 PM, said:
I'm thinking you're confused. Perhaps they reduce BY 20db, but I don't think they could reduce TO 20 db. A whisper in a library is rated at 30db with normal conversation running 60 to 70db.
I am sure you are right. but all I know is the echos are louder than the round going off.
US Army 1SG Retired
1979-2000
19Z50
TY-64885
RO June 2009
#21
Posted 21 February 2009 - 07:10 AM
When indoors I just back to my old reliable Peltor Ultimate 10's
After the watching the pro-ears video .. I'm really thinking about
buying them.
Their web site ..sucks though .. what a mess. They really need to
work on it. They reference several models in their FAQ area then
don't show those models.
#22
Posted 21 February 2009 - 07:23 AM
#23
Posted 21 February 2009 - 10:48 AM
Both groups seem to love their headsets.
Are the Sordins as good as the video the pro ears people have ..
If the pro ears are as good as that video .. I'm impressed and
if the Sordins are just as good and $50 less then .. more the better.
http://www.proears.c...-the-difference
#24
Posted 21 February 2009 - 11:29 AM
#25
Posted 21 February 2009 - 03:24 PM
This post has been edited by vluc: 21 February 2009 - 03:26 PM
Vince Lucchetti
L-3174
Western Pennsylvania Section Coordinator, Area 8
Western Pennsylvania Section Web Page

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote
















