Consistent .22 LR Bulk Ammo?
#1
Posted 20 March 2008 - 11:30 PM
I would prefer that the ammo also works with the AR15 Ciener Kit, Ruger 10/22, Ruger 22/45, AA Glock Kit and 1911 Kimber kit.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
I'm not a part of your system!!!
#2
Posted 21 March 2008 - 02:23 AM
Federal Auto Match also works great if you can find it. Mostly I find it at Wally World but they only seem to have two to three bricks at a time and I buy all they have.
Hope this helps
"You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
~ John Quincy Adams
Steven Bressan
#3
Posted 21 March 2008 - 02:56 AM
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBoz1911 - comments welcome
#4
Posted 21 March 2008 - 03:03 AM
With that said some general statements about bulk rimfire ammo my friends at www.rimfirecentral.com have a somewhat consensus about. Anything from Remington except the Eley/Remington is junk. Failure to fires and unacceptable accuracy. Federal AutoMatch works pretty decent across a wide variety of rifles. If you can find Winchester Dynapoints, they have a cult following. My rifle gave so-so accuracy. Winchester XPert22 will either work great or give groups like a 12ga. My rifle was one of the latter. Handguns are very picky about what they like. Nothing but trial and error to find what works.
If you find it useful here is a link to a ongoing project I'm doing chrono'ing .22RF through my various guns. The tables are in the 2nd and 3rd posts.
I've found that Aguila ammunition works pretty darn good across the board for lesser expensive ammo. If I really care about accuracy then I switch to Eley Standard brown box. 0.75 to 1.0 moa at 50 yd in a modified 10/22. Yeah, it's $4 a box but it's worth it.
My name is Hank and I'm an IPSC shooter.
#5
Posted 21 March 2008 - 06:19 AM
#6
Posted 21 March 2008 - 07:04 AM
All Rim fire Ammo is "LOT sensitive" and The way the rim fire ammo is made makes it hard to get consistency with it.
Consistent 22 Ammo is an Oxymoron
The ammo that I trust months of practice to when the national event is on the line for one run is the CCI Standard and CCI Minny mag.
Every thing Else seams to waist my time when I take it to the range. = But I demand a bit more the most do.
My second pick would be the Fed bulk box.
The teams that compete with the Augila ammo = get to pick from several "Lot #s" when the find a LOT that test out good
My favorite round that I can not afford to shoot is Fiocchi SM320 That stuff is great at 90yards and in my handgun at 50
So the Fact is when you buy some 22 rim fire = what works this week for cheep may not work next
In 1998? i think it was Win put out a large amount of ammo that failed 20% of the time several diff lot ##s
That has not happened again and The Win guys denied ever thing
Rudy Project shooting team
TY18956 / Steel Challenge 1060
#7
Posted 21 March 2008 - 07:24 AM
It gives me all the accuracy I need to hit the targets from 25 to 90yds. its one of the cleaner ammos that also produces good accuracy in all my 22's.
Trapr
I've seen the photographs!!!!!!!!!!!....................Those were drawings!!!!!!!!!!!!...............Whatever! !!!!!!!!!!!
There are reasons and excuses, excuses we make up and tell ourselves and others in an attempt to make us feel better or look better. Reasons are the truth, if we are strong, we learn from them. If we are weak, we make up more excuses.
Scout Swonson, 2-20-98 / 3-18-10...........................simply the best!!!!
#8
Posted 21 March 2008 - 09:31 AM
I have BY FAR had the best results with Winchester Expert. It comes in bulk boxes at Wally World.
Many brands quality has gone to Hell in the past 24 months. Bricks of Fereral and Remington I purchased in the past few months were so poorly crimped that the failure to feed and failure to fire ratio was at 1 out of every 3 rounds.
I have also used the Expert in my CZ and Browning 22 rifles and found it very adequate ammo for the price.
If money is no object Green Tag CCI match ammo is good.. but it costs 5X what I pay for the Winchester.
#9
Posted 21 March 2008 - 10:53 AM
USPSA L3077
I'm a lifer now!!!
http://theknightoflight.blogspot.com/
#10
Posted 21 March 2008 - 11:27 AM
#11
Posted 21 March 2008 - 12:06 PM
#13
Posted 21 March 2008 - 04:05 PM
If you can find it. Wolf/SK is very good although the price has gone way up. Used to be $30 brick for the lesser grade. That stuff will do 1 ragged hole@50 yds with my Lilja barreled 10/22.
Nick
#14
Posted 23 March 2008 - 12:10 PM
I had just bought a brick of Remington (not bulk, 500 rounds in 50 round boxes...) and a brick of Federal. Normally, I just would have thrown the Remington in there, as that is what I grabbed first and my Mk III isn't that particular on what it likes to eat. As an afterthought I threw in some of the Federal as well...
Well, that saved my butt today as on the first two strings of the day I had 2 rounds that didn't want to go bang and another one that detonated early, leaving a bullet stuck just inside the barrel. So out of 5 rounds, 3 wouldn't worky.
I figured pretty quickly that it was going to be a long frickin' day and loaded up for the rest of the day with the Federal, which worked like a champ....
#15
Posted 23 March 2008 - 02:46 PM
====================
Not to drift the thread, but my MkIII Ruger pistol eats WW Federal 550 bulk packs with about 1/150 failing to eject or fire......acceptable to me given its the absolute cheapest out there.
But my all-new Ruger 10/22 is failing to fully eject cases in one out of every four, with the above ammo. This sucker is going back to ruger real quick here if latest cleaning doesn't improve things.
BlackBuzzard
#16
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:38 PM
Order a new recoil spring for your 10-22, and start tuning "ie. clip a few coils" until the gun runs 100% with the Fed Bulk pack. It wont take but a couple. If your recoil spring is worn, then you wont, or shouldnt have a problem. The Bulk stuff is a little.....um....inconsistent.....
that is one possible fix for your rifle......
Good luck,
DougC
USPSA A-21848
ICORE IA 8465
#17
Posted 23 March 2008 - 06:21 PM
DougCarden, on Mar 23 2008, 03:38 PM, said:
Order a new recoil spring for your 10-22, and start tuning "ie. clip a few coils" until the gun runs 100% with the Fed Bulk pack. It wont take but a couple. If your recoil spring is worn, then you wont, or shouldnt have a problem. The Bulk stuff is a little.....um....inconsistent.....
that is one possible fix for your rifle......
Good luck,
DougC
Thanks!
I'll try that.
Inconsistent for sure with Federal bulk. Taking eyes off the front sight, instead watching the cases fly, they may go limp or strong from ejector.......totally random.
Like others I suspect, I am using 22LR as low cost practice. Dont need ragged holes at 50yd. But I do burn 500 rounds a session on steel plates easily.
BB
#18
Posted 24 March 2008 - 12:04 PM
Contact Randy at CPC. He will radius the aft lower edge of the bolt, grind the headspace to proper dimension, dowel the firing pin to better control it, and the outside surface is machine turned (jeweled). All for $55 shipped.
In my gun this modified bolt will allow cycling of anything I've stuck in it. Even subsonic at 1000 fps.
My name is Hank and I'm an IPSC shooter.
#19
Posted 24 March 2008 - 05:24 PM
I had to take both our 10/22s and grind the bolt face to get some decent FP reliability. Both rifles were different. Before modification they would not reliably fire in colder weather and it could have been a problem in normal weather as well.
At first I thought it was ammo related but after measuring the brass rim thickness and comparing it to the boltface I was amazed at the huge gap. IF I remember correctly the boltface was .050 " or deeper and the brass rims were .040-.041". The FP is limited in it's travel so reducing the bolt face a little helped it hit the brass rim harder.
I would reccommend everyone with a 10/22 problem do this mod either yourself or somebody who knows.
Nick
#20
Posted 09 February 2009 - 05:08 PM
Hank Ellis, on Mar 24 2008, 12:04 PM, said:
Contact Randy at CPC. He will radius the aft lower edge of the bolt, grind the headspace to proper dimension, dowel the firing pin to better control it, and the outside surface is machine turned (jeweled). All for $55 shipped.
In my gun this modified bolt will allow cycling of anything I've stuck in it. Even subsonic at 1000 fps.
Randy does do great work, but it is pretty easy to "reprofile" the rear of the bolt with a vice and a flat file. A little sanding/polishing and tada ..... much smoother bolt action and reliability.
A friend of mine told me "Your work has really made you cynical" my reply was "Cynical.....I passed cynical five years ago....I now live in reality"
Considering the amount of fancy equipment now seen in competition, some readers have complained loudly that the 'average guy' does not have a chance. It might be pointed out that this average guy never has had a chance. Competition is held to determine what is best, not what is average. And if all the equipment were standardized, the man who won would still not be in any sense average.
The Mondays
#21
Posted 09 February 2009 - 05:28 PM
I don't always shoot a rifle, but when I do... I prefer a Firebird. Stay accurate my friends.
If you're in the area, come enjoy my range: www.orangegunclub.com
#22
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:19 AM
ken hebert, on Feb 9 2009, 06:28 PM, said:
Take a look at www.rimfirecentral.com and do a search for 'bad automatch' in the 22 Ammunition section. A couple threads there where the bad lots are exposed. In a nutshell anything with a lot number of 1BW4xx is suspect. Federal will make good on it. These bad lots were discovered nearly a year ago and they still pop up at Wal-Mart.
My batch of AutoMatch gave me 0.7 MOA at 50' (0.118") average with the worst group still sub-MOA.
My name is Hank and I'm an IPSC shooter.
#23
Posted 10 February 2009 - 12:35 PM
My scoped 10/22 is sighted in for Winchester Wildcat, at 75 yards. That batch of ammo would hit a beverage can every time at 75, and about half the time (IIRC) at 100. For a circa-1974 gun which was the 1st I ever had, that is not bad. Of course, my H&R Mdl 12 will cloverleaf at 25 with good ammo, and I am not that steady. Of course, I shot up that ammo just before I moved last year and I do not remember what it was. Oh, well.
Lee
#24
Posted 11 February 2009 - 12:19 AM
MichiganShootist, on Mar 21 2008, 09:31 AM, said:
Coming from someone who used to work there, CCI Standard Velocity is the exact same ammo as Green Tag and any variation you see in accuracy between the two is simply lot-to-lot variation. Personal experience tells me that's the truth. I buy SV in bulk and have shot a fair number of 1/2" groups at 25yds from my Smith M41s and 22a (heavy barrel target model) using nothing more than a rolled up towel as a rest.
TY23298
SOB #8 The Selfincriminator
Never argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience!
#25
Posted 11 February 2009 - 04:35 AM
G-ManBart, on Feb 11 2009, 01:19 AM, said:
Remington rimfire across the board is junk. Misfires are very common. Stuff won't chrono below a SD of 20. Only one did. The Thunderbolts. It printed 2 MOA groups (0.357") at 50'. Only Remington rimfire I'll pull the trigger on is the Remington/Eley line.
Aguila is one that surprises me. Cheap and it works. The Subsonic line (HP and SP) both do very well in my guns. Aguila Standard Velocity gave identical performance to CCI Standard Velocity.
I've got some Fiocchi sitting on the shelf that needs to be printed for groups to see how it does.
My name is Hank and I'm an IPSC shooter.

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote











