Page 1 of 1
Anyone See Pardini's At Ipsc Style Matches Pardini GT45
#6
Posted 24 August 2006 - 08:42 PM
Mapzter, on Aug 24 2006, 08:36 PM, said:
Yeah, I know a guy who started out with a GT9. He shoots an STI Edge today. I think one of the reasons he changed was because of the magazine capacity.
Mag capacity? I don't get german really good but it seems to me that in that page it says 17rounds of 9mm; 13 of .40 and 13 of .45.
"Magazinkapazität: 9x19 mit 17 Schuss, 40S&W mit 13 Schuss, 45ACP mit 13 Schuss in 5" erhältlich. "
I reckon those 13 rounds of .40 are low when shooting limited, but that's out of the box, with no basepads or anything... It should be interesting to see how many you can cram there ina 140mm limited legal mag...
If I recall correctly, a STI with 126mm mags will also load 13 rounds of .40.
And, there's also the IPSC model, that according to the text there loads 17+1 of .40 (in IPSC Standard "fit-the-box" configuration).
"IPSC –Pistole im Kal. 40 S&W mit 5" Feld-Zug-Lauf, Jet-Funnel, Druckpunktloser IPSC– Abzug, Magazinverlängerung Kapazität 17+1, inkl. 2 Magazine"
On everything else, I agree.... Considering one can have a nice STI with SOME tweaking (not full house custom) for those U$S 2000, I'd go with the STI in a heartbeat.
The Gun Katas. Through analysis of thousands of recorded gunfights, the Cleric has determined that the geometric distribution of antagonists in any gun battle is a statistically predictable element. The Gun Kata treats the gun as a total weapon, each fluid position representing a maximum kill zone, inflicting maximum damage on the maximum number of opponents while keeping the defender clear of the statistically traditional trajectories of return fire. By the rote mastery of this art, your firing efficiency will rise by no less than 120%. The difference of a 63% increase to lethal proficiency makes the Master of the Gun Katas an adversary not to be taken lightly.
--Du Pont, Equilibrium--
--Du Pont, Equilibrium--
#7
Posted 24 August 2006 - 11:02 PM
Vincent,
no first-hand info here so please take this with a grain of salt.
A few years ago (3 or 4 probably) Pardini made an attempt to enter the IPSC shooting world with those guns, and a few local shooters used those guns in competition.
The reports I heard were not very favourable: the basic complain was (apart from mag capacity, as already noted) they were not reliably working, and they were not able to withstand the abuse we normally do on IPSC guns.
AFAIK, apart from few die-hard fans of these guns (mostly in Open and Production division), Pardinis totally disappeared from our matches.
no first-hand info here so please take this with a grain of salt.
A few years ago (3 or 4 probably) Pardini made an attempt to enter the IPSC shooting world with those guns, and a few local shooters used those guns in competition.
The reports I heard were not very favourable: the basic complain was (apart from mag capacity, as already noted) they were not reliably working, and they were not able to withstand the abuse we normally do on IPSC guns.
AFAIK, apart from few die-hard fans of these guns (mostly in Open and Production division), Pardinis totally disappeared from our matches.
This post has been edited by Skywalker: 24 August 2006 - 11:03 PM
Luca Zolla
------------
I have strong opinions, that I like to discuss in a civil manner.
------------
I have strong opinions, that I like to discuss in a civil manner.
#8
Posted 25 August 2006 - 04:59 AM
Skywalker, on Aug 25 2006, 03:02 PM, said:
Vincent,
no first-hand info here so please take this with a grain of salt.
A few years ago (3 or 4 probably) Pardini made an attempt to enter the IPSC shooting world with those guns, and a few local shooters used those guns in competition.
The reports I heard were not very favourable: the basic complain was (apart from mag capacity, as already noted) they were not reliably working, and they were not able to withstand the abuse we normally do on IPSC guns.
AFAIK, apart from few die-hard fans of these guns (mostly in Open and Production division), Pardinis totally disappeared from our matches.
no first-hand info here so please take this with a grain of salt.
A few years ago (3 or 4 probably) Pardini made an attempt to enter the IPSC shooting world with those guns, and a few local shooters used those guns in competition.
The reports I heard were not very favourable: the basic complain was (apart from mag capacity, as already noted) they were not reliably working, and they were not able to withstand the abuse we normally do on IPSC guns.
AFAIK, apart from few die-hard fans of these guns (mostly in Open and Production division), Pardinis totally disappeared from our matches.
We have one here in Denmark attempting IPSC with his GT9. It's educational to watch him shoot because you'll see every type of malfunction known and not known to man.
#10
Posted 25 August 2006 - 05:20 AM
Vincent
I have owned a GT45 and whilst it was a very nice to fire and accurate straight out of the box it suffered from malfunctions on a regular basis.
One of the scariest was when the hammer had a tendency to drop on its own.
They are also a fairly large gun.
I now use a custom STI.
AJ
I have owned a GT45 and whilst it was a very nice to fire and accurate straight out of the box it suffered from malfunctions on a regular basis.
One of the scariest was when the hammer had a tendency to drop on its own.
They are also a fairly large gun.
I now use a custom STI.
AJ
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote







