Trigger Control Poll...
#1
Posted 25 November 2005 - 08:03 PM
I've been using the trigger reset technique for the past few years and have had good results with it. However, because of this technique I cannot shoot the Para LDA's because there are 2 clicks before the trigger completely resets. When the first reset is felt I try getting off my 2nd shot and the gun doesn't do anything. Not a big deal because I don't shoot an LDA. I like this way of shooting because I feel that I'm always conscience of the trigger at all times.
However, after reading up on the trigger sweep/slap technique it makes a ton of sense. What I read is that if you place your index finger on a desk and tap it repeatidly several times it is much faster bringing your finger fully up and down as trying to stop the upwards motion half way and bringing it back down. This would translate into being faster with the trigger.
I think both ways make perfect sense and it is a matter of what works better for yourself. I will practice the trigger sweep over the next few months to see if it would be better for my shooting.
I'm curious to see how you use your trigger and why you do so.
Pete
#2
Posted 25 November 2005 - 08:22 PM
Scott Springer e-mail me here
My Facebook
#3
Posted 25 November 2005 - 10:18 PM
Reset... but I'm also shooting Glocks exclusively. Now, if I were using a Sig with a pristine trigger job (or anything else), things might be different. I don't have the experience with other platforms to say.
I will say that I'd pick one technique and stick with it, regardless of the platform. In fact, if you're switching platforms, the slap technique may be the best and only choice, as it will probably get you as close to a consistant pull as you can get with different styles of trigger. (ie, Whether you shoot a Glock or an LDA, you're still throwing your finger all the way forward and the all the way back with EVERY SINGLE SHOT.) As I see it, the problem with the reset method on multiple platforms is that you'll need to train yourself to have different muscle memories in what is essentially a high-speed reflexive situation, which may not work.
After all, it would really stink to be in a match and OOPS! you flub a shot because your index finger forgot which gun it was manipulating.
#4
Posted 26 November 2005 - 01:47 AM
But I've mulled going to the slap technique since my main focus is 3 gun. I have a 2-stage Jewell on my AR (that has a reset like a Beretta) and shoot a SVI and a Remington 1100. I figure the slap technique can help since the three guns have varying reset points and types. TGO's explanation on how the technique helps him in transitioning between different firearms is compelling.
Can you provide a link for the above info?However, after reading up on the trigger sweep/slap technique it makes a ton of sense. What I read is that if you place your index finger on a desk and tap it repeatidly several times it is much faster bringing your finger fully up and down as trying to stop the upwards motion half way and bringing it back down. This would translate into being faster with the trigger.
I don't think the slap is necessarily much faster. With the slap technique you have to slow down on the downstroke to execute the difficult shots. You may even blow through the reset point and not make an accurate enough shot. If all targets are hoser targets I would agree that it is faster. But if you throw in the smaller target areas and more difficult shots the slap technique can be considereably slower and at worst can't be used to reliably make the shot.
I am/was mainly looking to see if the technique can make the use of the 3 guns more consistent. I get trigger freeze with my AR and my SVI now and then. Yes it could be because I may be "trying." But it could also be that the triggers are different enough that the trigger freeze is actually the product of the different reset points and types between the different guns.
#5
Posted 26 November 2005 - 06:59 AM
Can you provide a link for the above info?
It all started from reading an article in the December 2005 issue of Shooting Times magazine. It starts on Page 14 and is the topic is: Firing Line by Scott E. Mayer A "Sweeping" trigger Technique.
If needed I can type the article in the topic just let me know.
Pete
#6
Posted 26 November 2005 - 07:56 AM
I'm no expert either, but I currently adhere the above philosophy. Seems like "slapping" the trigger is quickest for real close targets and "resetting" is best for long or tight shots. I understand and appreciate the philosophy of sticking to one or the other for consistency, muscel memory, etc., but I think this is a situation where multiple tools might provide the best results.There is a time and place for both . . .
#7
Posted 26 November 2005 - 04:42 PM
Why not try the other way of shooting and see if it is better for me. What do I have to lose? It might take me out of my game for a short while but in the long run make me a better shooter. If I hear something such as this and don't try it for myself then how will I ever know if it is better or not? I'm not one to believe in everything I read but am a believer in trying new ways to improve even if it doesn't work.
Pete
#8
Posted 26 November 2005 - 05:01 PM
I think most GMs would tell you the same thing. Saul Kirsch emphasizes this in his latest book and also points out that if something new doesn't work, it doesn't take much to get back to "the old way."Why not try the other way of shooting and see if it is better for me. What do I have to lose? It might take me out of my game for a short while but in the long run make me a better shooter. If I hear something such as this and don't try it for myself then how will I ever know if it is better or not?
#9
Posted 26 November 2005 - 05:03 PM
#10
Posted 26 November 2005 - 05:11 PM
And with all the extra practice you would be doing to work in the change, you might see things you havent seen before.
#11
Posted 26 November 2005 - 08:21 PM
On the close stuff, I do release my finger as fast as possible. But if it is a long shot, the trigger reset provides the best results.
I found this to be especially true on some of the fast swingers at A2.
I think I am going to devote this winter's practices to just using the trigger reset method. I want to get my timing down on doing the reset right before seeing the front set settle. So when it has settled I can press the trigger. I am losing time on having the sight settle then releasing to the reset, then pressing.
#12
Posted 26 November 2005 - 09:59 PM
Personally, when I am shooting monster splits in the low teens I manipulate the trigger same speed in, same speed out and that results in slapping. I don't have the touch required to actually "sense" the return just to the point of reset.
be
#13
Posted 27 November 2005 - 01:42 AM
#14
Posted 27 November 2005 - 11:08 AM
I used to reset, but now I slap. I thought, and it may be, that resetting is faster (marginally) than slapping, but I'm realizing that splits aren't as important as transitions and setup between shooting positions. I also found that I tend to push followup shots to the left on resetting. This went away once I took my trigger finger off the trigger face and came back w/ each shot. And the rare case of trigger freeze I would get seems to have gone away. So I am more consistent and more accurate coming off the trigger than staying on, and not significantly different timewise.
I also may be thinking of a "slap" in a different sense than some. Unless I'm on a really close in target, I don't pull through the trigger on the "slap". The shot should break when the sight picture is there, not when the finger is there. I'll bring my finger back to the trigger, but not press through until the shot is ready. I guess, for me, the slap is a trigger prep technique, not trigger press technique.
fwiw,
kevin c
Being unconquerable lies within yourself - Sun-Tzu
#15
Posted 27 November 2005 - 02:41 PM
I noticed a huge difference in my ability to motor along toward the end of the season because I was aware of doing the little things better. My split times actually slowed down over the course of the summer, yet my overall times sped up...go figure.
Team Unholstered
Team Grundhauser Gunworks
L2504
Get to know HIM before HE pays you a visit......
Open: M, Limited: M, Single Stack:M
Production: A, Limited-10: A,
Valkyrie0307 USPSA Youtube videos
#16
Posted 27 November 2005 - 03:21 PM
I do this too but I ride the trigger. It helps me to have a little bit of pre-travel.... but not press through until the shot is ready.
I've had this happen to me before. I bet if you checked your transition times they went down by at least half.My split times actually slowed down over the course of the summer, yet my overall times sped up...go figure.
#17
Posted 27 November 2005 - 03:58 PM
--Du Pont, Equilibrium--
#18
Posted 29 November 2005 - 09:01 PM
I am pretty liberal with 5 yard open targets, but on a 25 yard target I can still call my hits.
Trigger control in my eyes (or fingertips as the case may be) is just like the focus shifts that benos describes so very well in his book.
"There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, learning from failure." -Colin Powell
#19
Posted 29 November 2005 - 09:47 PM
Each target and each game and the game inside the game has a diferent setup. If I am jsut testing amoe or a barrel, or sighting in I use a diferent triger setup and pull, but they are alos close to the same.
If you don't learn them all or have a goal to learn, you will never find what your true protential can be. A fast double action Revover pull on a long target is a good trick to have when you need or wont it.
coming off the triger to reset for a two shot drill is a new trick for me, that I have just tryed this past two years. = I don't think I like it, and I don't think it has helped my shooting. I think it has cost me a year of missed calls on shots. And thanks for asking the question becuse I am goning to stop doing it.
I would rather have two slow hits that i know ware they hit in .23 splits over a .19 split that I cant be shurr of the hit, But at 49 in old compared to most.
TY18956 Multi Gun Cert RO
#20
Posted 12 September 2009 - 07:39 AM
#21
Posted 12 September 2009 - 01:26 PM
We have a device at work that puts a pressure sensor on the trigger of Glocks, 1911s, and a couple of others. In years of testing, they have never, ever seen a single shooter who was able to go from the shot breaking to the reset point (or even reasonably close) unless they slowed down to literally bullseye speed. This included many of the big name shooters in our sport. I know TGO and TJ were shown the system and gave it a try.
A very, very few people could go from the shot breaking to maybe halfway between the trigger reset point and where the trigger was fully extended. None were very close to the reset point and none were consistent about it.
Now, everybody that says "I use the reset point and can go right to it" calls BS when they're told this and say "yeah, but they're not me" so they try it on the machine and every single one of them learns that they're not really doing what they think and feel they're doing.
The reset theory for what we're doing (shooting at speed) actually messes up more shooter's trigger press...it's a useless time waster. If it's not possible to go exactly to the reset point outside of extremely slow, deliberate shooting (and reams of data prove it) then it just causes people to waste time with what they think is a deliberate, controlled release when they could have already completely released the trigger, prepped it as necessary for the shot required and be starting the next press.
It's sorta like "getting to the shooting" at the start of a stage, it's just "getting to the pressing"
Bartgolfs@yahoo.com if you want to reach me....I'm only here when absolutely necessary.
#22
Posted 12 September 2009 - 01:34 PM
I also may be thinking of a "slap" in a different sense than some. Unless I'm on a really close in target, I don't pull through the trigger on the "slap". The shot should break when the sight picture is there, not when the finger is there. I'll bring my finger back to the trigger, but not press through until the shot is ready. I guess, for me, the slap is a trigger prep technique, not trigger press technique.
Absolutely....it's not really a "slap" at all. It's simply getting the finger back on the trigger quickly, taking up the slack (prepping) and then the speed of the actual trigger press depends on the shot required. You can have the same speed of reset (going from trigger all the way back, releasing and taking the slack out) on all shots, with varying speeds of trigger press and have it work perfectly. R,
Bartgolfs@yahoo.com if you want to reach me....I'm only here when absolutely necessary.
#23
Posted 12 September 2009 - 04:36 PM
the shot breaks, just have the bullet exit hole pointed a the intended target at the time it goes BANG!
I am for the most part a (stock) Glock shooter and I *try* to "pin and reset" for tough shots
but if it is within my "X" distance I step on the bang switch.
Is one single trigger method used by anybody of note????
Is one single sight focus used by anybody of note???
Patrick(not of note)Kelley
“Speed without accuracy is useless, as is accuracy without speed and both together may not suffice without power.”
Jeff Cooper
Patrick's YOU TUBE
#24
Posted 12 September 2009 - 04:56 PM
only time I think about it is when you have a 35-50yd partial. Then I'll click to the reset
and squeez it off like a rifle..but I'm just figuring this out !!
#25
Posted 13 September 2009 - 10:37 AM
[/quote]
That's good. At least for me that says alot.
Kevin
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











