Jump to content


Photo

Trijicon SRS - is anyone using or tried one?


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Classic_jon

Classic_jon

    Calls Shots

  • Classifieds
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 745 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:D/FW area, Texas

Posted 07 August 2012 - 07:36 AM

I am looking to replace my stock cheap Red dot with a better one and have been looking at the Trijicon SRS as it is in my budget range. http://www.trijicon....uct1.php?id=SRS

Any thoughts on a good replacement red dot for Carbine or 3-gun would be appreciated. :cheers:
http://www.ctidpa.com

"What do you mean the OAL is all over the place...that shouldn't hurt anything, right?"


USPSA C in Limited-Minor

SSP EX
ESP SS
CDP SS
SSR MM (and for some silly reason, a lot of fun! :-D )

#2 Biz

Biz

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kentucky

Posted 01 October 2012 - 08:04 PM

I Have never used Trijicon SRS, however I have read articles and reviews about them, and all seemed pretty good. I do own a Trijicon acog scope and that was one my best buys, they are expensive but I do highly suggest them.

#3 Alaskapopo

Alaskapopo

    Burned Out

  • Classifieds
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,549 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Alaska

Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:28 PM

I am looking to replace my stock cheap Red dot with a better one and have been looking at the Trijicon SRS as it is in my budget range. http://www.trijicon....uct1.php?id=SRS

Any thoughts on a good replacement red dot for Carbine or 3-gun would be appreciated. :cheers:

For three gun get the Prisimatic from Leupold because you can have hold overs. For a work of defense gun its a great sight comparable to an Aimpoint. I personally prefer the T1/H1 in that application.
Pat
Serving since 1999 as a LEO. Firearms instructor since 2001. Armorer for Colt AR15 weapons family, 1911 and Glock pistols.
USPSA # A56876 B Class

#4 iShootguns

iShootguns

    Finally read the FAQs

  • Classified
  • PipPip
  • 147 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Orlando, Florida

Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:01 AM


I am looking to replace my stock cheap Red dot with a better one and have been looking at the Trijicon SRS as it is in my budget range. http://www.trijicon....uct1.php?id=SRS

Any thoughts on a good replacement red dot for Carbine or 3-gun would be appreciated. :cheers:

For three gun get the Prisimatic from Leupold because you can have hold overs. For a work of defense gun its a great sight comparable to an Aimpoint. I personally prefer the T1/H1 in that application.
Pat


I just looked at the Prismatic, which reticle allows for holds? I see the Circle Plex and the DCD reticles. Thanks!

#5 Adrian

Adrian

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:34 PM

Pat Rogers said one died in one of his carbine classes. Electronics just died.

I might buy something with an established track record.

#6 anthem

anthem

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 22 posts

Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:23 PM

I have one on my ar. Haven't tried to use it for really long range, but love the large FOV. It's a big piece of glass but doesn't weight that much on an AR. I replaced an eotech XPS2-2 with the SRS and couldn't have been happier.

#7 ltdmstr

ltdmstr

    Sees Sights

  • Classifieds
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ORD

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:24 PM

Very nice optic. Surprised to hear about reliability issues, as Trijicon stuff is usually top quality. I've looked at these several times and compared the to Aimpoint H1/Tq at the SHOT Show last week. I was just about to pull the trigger and order one for a new carbine, and then I saw that the darn thing weighs close to a pound (14+ oz.). I didn't notice the weight on the plastic dummy rifles, but that's a lot. So I decided to go with a Aimpoint H1 (2MOA) and LaRue mount, which weighs under 4 oz.

#8 Adrian

Adrian

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

It's not a bad optic, but it is brand new. There are bound to be issues. It's a good concept, which over time will give way to a solid optic.

#9 anthem

anthem

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 22 posts

Posted 25 January 2013 - 08:12 PM

It is definitely heavier than the smaller optics like H1/T1 or RMR type of optics. If you're hauling around for long periods - then its a factor to consider. But in terms of CQB and other things - the SRS will blow away most others since the large FOV and view through the optic is much easier to work with. It's good essentially from 10 ft out (haven't shot past 100 since the ranges here are only that large).

#10 DaveTimm

DaveTimm

    Finally read the FAQs

  • Classified
  • PipPip
  • 90 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brainerd, MN

Posted 27 January 2013 - 07:29 PM

Anything man made can fail so don't let one report of a down srs steer you away. I have three dead aimpoint comp m4's on my desk now waiting to go back to the mother ship so anything can fail. I got to shoot a demo rifle with the srs and was impressed with the sight. The view was nice and I didn't have as much of the "straw" or tube look. I have a bunch of aimpoints already otherwise I'd give it a strong look.

#11 ltdmstr

ltdmstr

    Sees Sights

  • Classifieds
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ORD

Posted 27 January 2013 - 08:27 PM

Having looked at the two almost side by side, I thought the larger view with the SRS was a big advantage over the Aimpoint. Only reason I didn't go with the SRS is I'm really trying to get the weight down on the gun I'm building. I'll probably get one for the next project.

#12 basing110

basing110

    Looks for Range

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:09 AM

I have one with the bobro mount and it has not failed at all... fov is awesome and its glass is real clear




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users