Glock 21 Gen 4 Shooting Low - Why?
#1
Posted 21 May 2012 - 01:09 PM
When I swap out for a Glock 34 with the same Sevigny sights at the .215 height I'm point of aim/point of impact.
Is it possible it is me? Is there something with the configuration of the gun? Perhaps the reduced slide length/sight radius? Most issues I've encountered with Glocks have related to windage not shooting either low or high?
Any thoughts? Tips for correction?
Thanks, speedseeker
#2
Posted 21 May 2012 - 02:40 PM
#3
Posted 22 May 2012 - 08:47 AM
#4
Posted 22 May 2012 - 12:53 PM
(Sight Radius x POA/POI Difference) divided by distance, will give you your change in front sight height
7" (sight radius) x 5" (POI difference) = 12
12 / 432"(12yds) = 0.0277
.215 - 0.027 = .188"
So a .190 or .195 front sight may be the solution. Have a few other solid shooters try it out first. If they all have the same issue as you, the front sight change should fix it.
#5
Posted 22 May 2012 - 02:15 PM
#6
Posted 22 May 2012 - 02:41 PM
The rear sight on a G21 is .016 taller than the rear sight on a G34. If you are running the same height rear sight on both pistols the front sight needs to be .016 lower on the G21.
Aren't all Sevigny rear sights the same height?
.
Edited by MEAT, 22 May 2012 - 03:42 PM.
#7
Posted 22 May 2012 - 03:26 PM
Aren't all Sevigny rear sights are the same height?
Yes, the adjustment is made by different height front sights. I would e-mail Scott Warren to see if he makes a shorter front sight. I have only seen the stock .215 and the optional .245 that most use on the G-34/35 guns.
Scott sometimes takes a minute to e-mail you back (He's a full-time LEO), but he WILL get back to you.
If he doesn't offer one, the other option would be to continue using the Sevigny rear and switch to a shorter Dawson Precision sight.
Master Instructor
Owner, Camp Creek Gunworks "Ask about the new E-SASS and C-SASS rifles."
"Those who live by the sword...are probably pretty f***ing good at it" - me
Hey...Tactical Ted: Unless you have the ability to call in JDAM strikes from Predator drones, I really don't see why you insist on having 4 FEET of tactical rails on your freakin' AR-15.
"Bravo/Delta, 2 Mike, 4 No-Shoots, 4 Extra Shots......Real Life really IS Virginia Count". - me, on the scene of an actual self-defense shooting in my jurisdiction
"You can get a man to blow himself up with the promise of 72 doe-eyed virgins waiting for him in heaven. You could NEVER get a woman to blow herself up with the promise of 72 inexperienced Abercrombie & Fitch models."
#8
Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:17 AM
Using Dawson Precision's calculator (in inches), and my GEN 4 G21 sight radius (Sevigny Sights) and your POA/POI difference:
(Sight Radius x POA/POI Difference) divided by distance, will give you your change in front sight height
7" (sight radius) x 5" (POI difference) = 12
12 / 432"(12yds) = 0.0277
.215 - 0.027 = .188"
So a .190 or .195 front sight may be the solution. Have a few other solid shooters try it out first. If they all have the same issue as you, the front sight change should fix it.
Wow, this is great feedback. The shame of it is I love the Sevigny's and I don't think they make a shorter front sight. I'll definatly have a few other shooters give it a go and see what happens before I make any moves.
BTW, to your initial question. I'm shooting Federal Red Box hardball from Wally World.
Edited by speedseeker, 24 May 2012 - 10:17 AM.
#9
Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:23 AM
Aren't all Sevigny rear sights are the same height?
Yes, the adjustment is made by different height front sights. I would e-mail Scott Warren to see if he makes a shorter front sight. I have only seen the stock .215 and the optional .245 that most use on the G-34/35 guns.
Scott sometimes takes a minute to e-mail you back (He's a full-time LEO), but he WILL get back to you.
If he doesn't offer one, the other option would be to continue using the Sevigny rear and switch to a shorter Dawson Precision sight.
"The rear sight on a G21 is .016 taller than the rear sight on a G34." Hmm...who woulda thunk it? The fact that the Sevigny's are all the same height in the rear suggests the difference on the Glock isnt the actual sight but the depth of the cutout and/or the hieght of the rear sight. Any idea why Glock would have that kind of a difference between platforms?
I'll definatly take your advice regarding contacting Scott. I believe your right though I havent seen anything other than the .215. and .245 offered. I do really like the Dawson's and would go that route if I had to but one of the major reasons I like the Sevigny's is because of the size of the light bar I get given how thin the front blade is relative to the rear notch. Last I checked you cant get a dawson that thin can you?
Edited by speedseeker, 24 May 2012 - 10:25 AM.
#10
Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:49 AM
#11
Posted 25 May 2012 - 04:39 AM
On every other Glock, the rear sight is 6.5mm tall. On the G-21 and G-37, the OEM sight is 6.9mm tall.
Glock chooses to make different rear sights to compensate. Warren Tactical does the adjustment in front sight height, which is actually easier to do. Front sights are easier to machine and easier to change the machine set-up to make different heights. They are a whole lot easier for the end user to swap out also.
Master Instructor
Owner, Camp Creek Gunworks "Ask about the new E-SASS and C-SASS rifles."
"Those who live by the sword...are probably pretty f***ing good at it" - me
Hey...Tactical Ted: Unless you have the ability to call in JDAM strikes from Predator drones, I really don't see why you insist on having 4 FEET of tactical rails on your freakin' AR-15.
"Bravo/Delta, 2 Mike, 4 No-Shoots, 4 Extra Shots......Real Life really IS Virginia Count". - me, on the scene of an actual self-defense shooting in my jurisdiction
"You can get a man to blow himself up with the promise of 72 doe-eyed virgins waiting for him in heaven. You could NEVER get a woman to blow herself up with the promise of 72 inexperienced Abercrombie & Fitch models."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










