Meopta ZD 1-4x22 kdot question
#1
Posted 10 January 2012 - 01:34 AM
I am writing on behalf of a friend who does not speak English but is a very much into guns of all sorts. I apologise for any mistakes or inconistencies who are entirely mine as I am not an arms expert but merely serve as translator.
My friend is planning to buy a Meopta ZD 1-4x22 kdot. I have found some useful information in this forum posted on June 8th, 2011 (I seem to be unable to insert the link to the page - the title is "New Meopta ZD1-24 now available by Nick Weidhaas). However, my friend would like some additional information about the chevrons and how they are set.
Fullauto Shooter (poster of above link) lists the drops assigned to the chevrons. My friend would like to know, whether there is any information available concerning the bullet weight (grains) used and how the bullet weight influences the trajectory.
He is planning to buy the scope for his M4 Carabiner SS109 556 x 45 mm.
Thank you for your help.
#2
Posted 10 January 2012 - 03:12 PM
There was recently another thread on the ZD that stating the 1st arrow is 4.58 moa low, the second is 7.98 moa, and the 3rd is 12.11 moa. This is, I believe, from the center of the dot. The dot is 2 moa diameter. The arrows are 1.9 moa tall. The horizontal lines are 9 moa wide (if they are the same as the K-dot reticle). The gaps on the right and left of the dot are 2 moa wide.
The instructions that came with my ZD provide the below values for the dot and arrrows, when used on 4x
5.56Nato 7.62x39 186-223 Rem
Dot 100m 100m 100m
1st arrow 300m 220m 300m
2d arrow 400m 290m 370m
3rd arrow 500m 360m 480m
I am not sure what their underlying data was, but my KAC ballistic software tells me that the M855 cartridge (62 grn bullet with a BC of .151) when fired out of a 14.5" barrel will be travelling 2900 fps (883.9 mps) at the muzzle.
This is with standard atmoshperic conditions of 59 degrees F, barometric pressure of 29.92 In/HG, at sea level.
Your friend should obtain and read up on ballistics, specifically, "external ballistics". There is much more to it that I can explain here or that I even know (I am just a layman).
The Sierra Bullets loading manual (for rifle) has some info on external ballistics, and there are no doublt all kinds of resources on the internet for learning about this.
Same thing for ballistics software. The Strelok app for iphone and android has the ZD reticle in it, and makes this very easy (I just started using it and have yet to confirm how good it works in reality).
Knowing the velocity and BC of the bullet is important as knowing the weight.
And of course, you'll want to confirm your projections by actually shooting.
Hope that helps.
Edited by A38337, 10 January 2012 - 03:13 PM.
#3
Posted 11 January 2012 - 03:18 AM
Fabio, my friend, plans to use the scope for IPSC rifle shooting competitions. He wonders whether there are scopes that support the distances shot in those competitions more. He is looking for maximum distances of
dot = 100 m
1st chevron = max 200 m
2nd chevron = max 300 m
3rd chevron = max. 400 m
Would anyone know of a scope that would fulfil these requirements with the same reticle and for 556 Nato?
#4
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:42 PM
The Leupold CQ/T with the CMR-2 reticle and the Leupold MR/T with the CMR-2 reticle might also work. However, the former is 1-3x and the latter is 1.5 - 5x (or more accurately, 1.5 - 4.5x).
Just remember that the marks in any BDC need to be confirmed by shooting the optic at those distances with your rifle and ammo. BDCs can often be off a little, or a lot. You have to test it to find out for yourself.
#5
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:12 PM
100 yds 1.5inches high
200 yds zeroed at top of dot
300 yds bottom of the dot
400 yds tip of the first chevron
500 yds tip of the second chevron
600 yds tip of the third chevron.
With respect to finding the exact scope to fit the exact load....it's impossible. There are many BDC reticles out there and they all require some compromise based on the particular rifles muzzle velocity.
IMO the meopta is one of the easiest to live with.
Edited by smokshwn, 11 January 2012 - 08:13 PM.
A friend of mine told me "Your work has really made you cynical" my reply was "Cynical.....I passed cynical five years ago....I now live in reality"
Considering the amount of fancy equipment now seen in competition, some readers have complained loudly that the 'average guy' does not have a chance. It might be pointed out that this average guy never has had a chance. Competition is held to determine what is best, not what is average. And if all the equipment were standardized, the man who won would still not be in any sense average.
The Mondays
#7
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:52 PM
Try Jay at sportopticsAnyone have a good source for purchasing a Meopta ZD at a decent price??
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
#8
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:56 PM
#10
Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:58 AM
Tell him to take a look (here in these forums and elsewhere on the 'net) at the Burris Tac 30 and the Burris MTAC. They are 1x - 4x optics with BDCs applicable to his goal.
The Leupold CQ/T with the CMR-2 reticle and the Leupold MR/T with the CMR-2 reticle might also work. However, the former is 1-3x and the latter is 1.5 - 5x (or more accurately, 1.5 - 4.5x).
Just remember that the marks in any BDC need to be confirmed by shooting the optic at those distances with your rifle and ammo. BDCs can often be off a little, or a lot. You have to test it to find out for yourself.
Excellent, he is off researching.
Maybe you are interested to know that the Leopold CQ is on the list of sensitive items and can not be bought by and shipped to residents outside the States. Thanks to all for your help.
#11
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:50 AM
This is good info. I wonder if the third chevron would be close for using on REAL close targets where you have to hold over because of the relationship between the bore and the optic?If your friend will zero the Meopta at 200yds at the top of the center dot then the holds with the reticle will be very close to the following with most any standard 223 load.
100 yds 1.5inches high
200 yds zeroed at top of dot
300 yds bottom of the dot
400 yds tip of the first chevron
500 yds tip of the second chevron
600 yds tip of the third chevron.
With respect to finding the exact scope to fit the exact load....it's impossible. There are many BDC reticles out there and they all require some compromise based on the particular rifles muzzle velocity.
IMO the meopta is one of the easiest to live with.
#12
Posted 05 February 2012 - 10:13 PM
#13
Posted 06 February 2012 - 08:56 AM
This is good info. I wonder if the third chevron would be close for using on REAL close targets where you have to hold over because of the relationship between the bore and the optic?
If your friend will zero the Meopta at 200yds at the top of the center dot then the holds with the reticle will be very close to the following with most any standard 223 load.
100 yds 1.5inches high
200 yds zeroed at top of dot
300 yds bottom of the dot
400 yds tip of the first chevron
500 yds tip of the second chevron
600 yds tip of the third chevron.
With respect to finding the exact scope to fit the exact load....it's impossible. There are many BDC reticles out there and they all require some compromise based on the particular rifles muzzle velocity.
IMO the meopta is one of the easiest to live with.
With a 250 yd zero - as noted above - 25 yds is between the bottom of the dot and the first chevron (-3MOA). For all practical purposes you can use the top of the first chevron, keeping in mind you might need to aim a hair low. This works well at 1x and 4x (though it's unlikely you would use 4x on a COF for that close of target.)
Photo below is from the Strelok Ballistic Calculator (Android Market) with a 250 yd zero. Showing a 25 yd POA/POI. The numbers on the screenshot are not visible on the actual reticle, only on the Strelok program.
Ballistic Data:
MV - 2905 fps
Bullet - 55 grain
BC - 0.269
Altitude - 5600 ft
Temp 67 F
BP - 30 inHg
Zeroed at 250 yds
meopta.jpg 33.62K
121 downloads
Edited by SteveT-NV, 06 February 2012 - 06:30 PM.
Monthly 3-Gun Matches in Reno, NV
#14
Posted 06 February 2012 - 03:28 PM
I think even I can figure that out. It's decided, I need one. I've been looking for 6 months at all the 3gun scopes and narrowed it down to Meopta or a Pibull and I'm going with a ZD. Now if I can only find one for $850.
This is good info. I wonder if the third chevron would be close for using on REAL close targets where you have to hold over because of the relationship between the bore and the optic?
If your friend will zero the Meopta at 200yds at the top of the center dot then the holds with the reticle will be very close to the following with most any standard 223 load.
100 yds 1.5inches high
200 yds zeroed at top of dot
300 yds bottom of the dot
400 yds tip of the first chevron
500 yds tip of the second chevron
600 yds tip of the third chevron.
With respect to finding the exact scope to fit the exact load....it's impossible. There are many BDC reticles out there and they all require some compromise based on the particular rifles muzzle velocity.
IMO the meopta is one of the easiest to live with.
With a 250 yd zero - as noted above - 25 yds is between the bottom of the dot and the first chevron (-3MOA). For all practical purposes you can use the top of the first chevron, keeping in mind you might need to aim a hair low. This works well at 1x and 4x (though it's unlikely you would use 4x on a COF for that close of target.)
Photo below is from the Strelok Ballistic Calculator (Android Market) with a 250 yd zero. Showing a 25 yd POA/POI. The numbers on the screenshot are not visible on the actual reticle, only on the Strelok program.meopta.jpg 33.62K 121 downloads
#15
Posted 06 February 2012 - 05:36 PM
The ballistic info for the round is a 55gr Nosler Ballistic Tip with a muzzle velocity of 3100fps
The yellow highlighted bullseye shows POI for 300yds.
Changing the round to a 68 gr Hornady BTHP at 2850 only changes the bottom most chevron to 593 yds instead of 609. The other holdovers remain the same.
Attached Files
Edited by smokshwn, 06 February 2012 - 05:37 PM.
A friend of mine told me "Your work has really made you cynical" my reply was "Cynical.....I passed cynical five years ago....I now live in reality"
Considering the amount of fancy equipment now seen in competition, some readers have complained loudly that the 'average guy' does not have a chance. It might be pointed out that this average guy never has had a chance. Competition is held to determine what is best, not what is average. And if all the equipment were standardized, the man who won would still not be in any sense average.
The Mondays
#16
Posted 06 February 2012 - 07:39 PM
I don't know what ballistic information was used in the previous pic (bullet, velocity, etc) but here is another pic of the reticle zeroed at 200yds on the top of the center dot.
The ballistic info for the round is a 55gr Nosler Ballistic Tip with a muzzle velocity of 3100fps
The yellow highlighted bullseye shows POI for 300yds.
Changing the round to a 68 gr Hornady BTHP at 2850 only changes the bottom most chevron to 593 yds instead of 609. The other holdovers remain the same.
Sorry,
I updated my post above for the Ballistic data. I may be doing something wrong, but I'm getting different values than you are for a 68 gr bullet at a MV of 2850 fps. 1st Chev - 375, 2nd - 453, 3rd - 539 - See below. What BC are you using for the 68 Gr Horn? Are you sure you changed the MV for the heavier bullet?
Attached Files
Edited by SteveT-NV, 06 February 2012 - 09:36 PM.
Monthly 3-Gun Matches in Reno, NV
#17
Posted 11 February 2012 - 04:11 PM
#18
Posted 11 February 2012 - 05:44 PM
#19
Posted 12 February 2012 - 06:05 AM
#20
Posted 12 February 2012 - 08:08 PM
#21
Posted 12 February 2012 - 08:29 PM
I got tired of waiting for an answer. Of course I guess I took six months to figure out which scope I wanted in the first place!Was that $850 a typo or is it actually possible to get it at this price?
#22
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:13 AM
Too bad--they lost my business when they did that. I'll wait until the Leupold Mark 6 1-6X now, even though it's expected to be $1600-$1800.
I'd recommend against Optics Planet. They did a bitch move on me recently. Last year, I ordered an S&B Short Dot Gen 2. It had to be backordered. After SHOT Show 2012 passed, S&B apparently pulled a price increase on them. Optics Planet canceled my order, claiming it was a "typographical error." BULLS--T. It was because they didn't have the scope in stock, waited too long on backorder, got caught by a price increase, and needed a way to weasel out of the deal. Needless to say, I won't be buying from Optics Planet again. Because I was waiting for my order and not checking various forums, I missed out on three used Short Dots that sold during my four-month wait.
Edited by dchang0, 13 February 2012 - 01:21 AM.
#23
Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:52 PM
#24
Posted 20 February 2012 - 08:17 PM
if you call in you can get a better deal for the most part :-)
This guy knows his stuff.
#25
Posted 21 February 2012 - 03:42 PM
Oh and one more thing. I have about 12hrs on the original battery now with no discernable reduction in reticle brightness.
Edited by co-exprs, 21 February 2012 - 03:43 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










