Ruger LC9
#1
Posted 07 March 2011 - 07:15 PM
#2
Posted 08 March 2011 - 07:53 AM
#3
Posted 08 March 2011 - 03:04 PM
Yep, I thought Ruger where about the tuffest on the market. Got a 93 94 and a stainless GB had a custom 1022 .That's a bummer! I'm sorry to hear that. I've got almost 2k rounds through my LCP and no failures oh any kind. I bought it almost a year ago so it was produced well after all the recall fun, but honestly, Ruger needs to get these guns working right BEFORE they leave the factory.
#4
Posted 08 March 2011 - 03:47 PM
I'm with ya. I've always had the utmost faith in Ruger. I've got 2 new 581 series mini 14's in sage int. aluminum cqb stocks, one I had shortened to 14.5 with a perm fh installed and the other is 18.5 that I had threaded and installed a fh. No problems with either. Over 40k rounds between them not one failure. I had a P95, same thing it never failed but I sold it got an SR9 had to send it back a week after I got it for the recall. It worked fine before but it made me nervous so I sent it in. Then my bro got the SR556 about a year and a half ago and it wouldn't work! Had to send it back! It has been flawless since back but they wouldn't tell him what was wrong before. Weird... I still really like Ruger but they need to stop rushing these new designs out the door BEFORE they are ready. If you give the LC9 another chance let me know how it shoots.Yep, I thought Ruger where about the tuffest on the market. Got a 93 94 and a stainless GB had a custom 1022 .
That's a bummer! I'm sorry to hear that. I've got almost 2k rounds through my LCP and no failures oh any kind. I bought it almost a year ago so it was produced well after all the recall fun, but honestly, Ruger needs to get these guns working right BEFORE they leave the factory.
Mike.
Mike
#5
Posted 08 March 2011 - 05:00 PM
Its amazing how small and flat it is for a 9mm. The trigger has long pull and reset but I like that in a pocket pistol.
I'm with ya. I've always had the utmost faith in Ruger. I've got 2 new 581 series mini 14's in sage int. aluminum cqb stocks, one I had shortened to 14.5 with a perm fh installed and the other is 18.5 that I had threaded and installed a fh. No problems with either. Over 40k rounds between them not one failure. I had a P95, same thing it never failed but I sold it got an SR9 had to send it back a week after I got it for the recall. It worked fine before but it made me nervous so I sent it in. Then my bro got the SR556 about a year and a half ago and it wouldn't work! Had to send it back! It has been flawless since back but they wouldn't tell him what was wrong before. Weird... I still really like Ruger but they need to stop rushing these new designs out the door BEFORE they are ready. If you give the LC9 another chance let me know how it shoots.
Yep, I thought Ruger where about the tuffest on the market. Got a 93 94 and a stainless GB had a custom 1022 .
That's a bummer! I'm sorry to hear that. I've got almost 2k rounds through my LCP and no failures oh any kind. I bought it almost a year ago so it was produced well after all the recall fun, but honestly, Ruger needs to get these guns working right BEFORE they leave the factory.
Mike.
Mike
#6
Posted 08 March 2011 - 05:03 PM
I am still very interesting in looking at the LC9, I want a nice affordable 9mm pocket gun, and I was hoping that the Ruger would be the one to go to
A52987
Indiana USPSA Section Coordinator
Indiana USPSA Championship
http://www.uspsaindiana.org/
Shooting Videos
#7
Posted 09 March 2011 - 07:42 AM
Don't get me wrong, I love my .380 LCP! And yes the LC9 will be my next ccw. I was just ranting a bit because I'm noticing a bit of a trend with Rugers new designs. They're all really cool, but they seem to be sending'em out a little early. I'm with you though. For a carry nine the LC9 will be the way to go. I'll get one I'm just going to wait now to see if his firing pin was an isolated issue or if its going to be some sort of recall.I think Ruger ahs been rushing product out to the market and we are have been seeing that in the recalls.
I am still very interesting in looking at the LC9, I want a nice affordable 9mm pocket gun, and I was hoping that the Ruger would be the one to go to
Mike
#9
Posted 09 March 2011 - 02:48 PM
#10
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:04 PM
#11
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:43 PM
I just picked up one of these (x-mas bonus)and took it out to the range yesterday. Fired 150 rounds with no failures of any kind-ran like a sewing machine. However, I couldn't hit the side of a barn with it. That l-o-n-g heavy trigger pull is hard for me to deal with. More practice? I wonder if anything could be done about the trigger.
I'm sure something could be done for the trigger, but you should probably just dryfire it a lot. The triggers on a lot of guns improve dramatically after a few hundred dryfires. Of course, shooting it a lot works too, but dryfire is a lot cheaper
#12
Posted 25 December 2011 - 12:13 AM
http://www.gallowayp...manceparts.html
There's a video on YouTube that details removing the mag safety which may smooth out the pull, but it doesn't really shorten it.
#13
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:02 AM
#14
Posted 27 May 2012 - 02:03 PM
#15
Posted 27 May 2012 - 08:33 PM
Everyone I talk to now say these LC9s are hard to get unless you want one with a laser. Anybody hear any different.
#16
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:11 PM
#17
Posted 21 September 2012 - 06:01 PM
I just picked up one of these (x-mas bonus)and took it out to the range yesterday. Fired 150 rounds with no failures of any kind-ran like a sewing machine. However, I couldn't hit the side of a barn with it. That l-o-n-g heavy trigger pull is hard for me to deal with. More practice? I wonder if anything could be done about the trigger.
Slight necro but I've found that with mine I'm more accurate shooting it strong hand only. There's not enough gun to get a good grip with two hands and at least for me, the pull is so long my trigger finger would touch the support hand before the thing fired and throw off my aim.
We were able to get about 2 inch groups at 10 yards SLLOOOWWW firing with Winchester 147gr PDX1s. Groups were also good with my 147gr lead bullet with 3.3gr of N320.
IDPA - A48053.
USPSA Production "C" Class
IDPA SSP Expert/CDP&SSR Sharpshooter
#18
Posted 25 October 2012 - 07:21 AM
It is physically impossible for an object in motion to move in two separate directions simultaneously.
I may be slow, but I'm inaccurate.
#19
Posted 25 October 2012 - 08:36 AM
IDPA - A48053.
USPSA Production "C" Class
IDPA SSP Expert/CDP&SSR Sharpshooter
#20
Posted 31 October 2012 - 07:48 AM
Every mfr has problems from time. Overall Ruger guns have an excellent track record of reliability and ruggedness. I buy Ruger with the intention of paying for a trigger job. I expect I will do tha Galway upgrade on the LC9. They are having trouble getting parts and are not shipping their kit. You can mail in your OEM Ruger parts and they will modify them.
#21
Posted 05 November 2012 - 05:54 PM
I buy Ruger with the intention of paying for a trigger job. I expect I will do tha Galway upgrade on the LC9. They are having trouble getting parts and are not shipping their kit. You can mail in your OEM Ruger parts and they will modify them.
I purchased my LC9 in February, so I guess it is about time for an update on Galloway trigger modification. I first removed the mag disconnect, but not the LCI. I have put about 1600 rounds through the LC9 since the trigger mod. I have tried most major brands of factory ammo and 5 or 6 of my different 9MM hadloads. My main concern was that the gun had to function each and every time, prior to using it as my EDC gun. It has been flawless, no FTF, FTE, or any other stoppage. As for the trigger itself, it does not reduce the trigger pull, only the length of pull. It is really smooth. The shorter trigger pull has produced a remarkable improvement in my accuracy, not the guns accuracy, but in my ability to shoot it more accurately. IMHO, this is an upgrade that really completes the gun for CCW use. It now has replaced my P3AT as my EDC gun.
#22
Posted 06 November 2012 - 06:05 PM
#23
Posted 28 November 2012 - 07:31 PM
I had an LC9 that would sometimes produce light primer strikes on S&B and PMC ammo. My other nines had no trouble with the same ammo. Wound up getting my money back. YMMV.
I tried one at my local range last week. Or, I should say my girlfriend did. At 20 feet she put the first 3 bullets she shot on top of each other. She had not shot for 6 months, a year before that.
I am definitely keeping the girlfriend
#24
Posted 28 November 2012 - 09:39 PM
It is physically impossible for an object in motion to move in two separate directions simultaneously.
I may be slow, but I'm inaccurate.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











