Clays Metering
#26
Posted 12 February 2011 - 11:01 PM
TN EMT-P
NRA Member
USPSA-A70905
#27
Posted 13 February 2011 - 07:03 PM
#28
Posted 13 February 2011 - 07:13 PM
TN EMT-P
NRA Member
USPSA-A70905
#29
Posted 14 February 2011 - 04:49 PM
I've also tried what I will call the "multi-throw average" technique, and what I found is that while I'd still get the single throw variation, but it averaged out about right, and gets better the more throws you average.
Other than that it's a really soft shooting 45 powder, and I've been pretty happy with it.
Testing with my chono and a 1911 showed that at 4.0 grains of regular Clays, using 230 grn MG CMJ's loaded to 1.25 with Winchester Primers, to be a pretty light load, <650 fps. Since then I've upped the load to 4.2 grains, but haven't had a chance to chrono it yet.
Jason
#30
Posted 14 March 2011 - 09:12 AM
I guess I'm not in the majority, because I've noticed +/- 0.1 grain variability from my 650 when using Clay's. I haven't been reloading all that long, so maybe that's acceptable when using a digital scale that only has 0.1 digits grn of resolution, but it's worse than the throw accuracy I get when loading N320 for 9mm.
I've also tried what I will call the "multi-throw average" technique, and what I found is that while I'd still get the single throw variation, but it averaged out about right, and gets better the more throws you average.
Other than that it's a really soft shooting 45 powder, and I've been pretty happy with it.
Testing with my chono and a 1911 showed that at 4.0 grains of regular Clays, using 230 grn MG CMJ's loaded to 1.25 with Winchester Primers, to be a pretty light load, <650 fps. Since then I've upped the load to 4.2 grains, but haven't had a chance to chrono it yet.
Jason
Jason
I'm glad I read your post. It points out that the old adage is "right on". That is, different guns shoot different velocities with the identical loads. Your load would put me over 180 pf. That doesn't make your load good or bad, just different from what works for me. Interesting stuff.
Joe
#31
Posted 17 March 2011 - 08:57 PM
I guess I'm not in the majority, because I've noticed +/- 0.1 grain variability from my 650 when using Clay's. I haven't been reloading all that long, so maybe that's acceptable when using a digital scale that only has 0.1 digits grn of resolution, but it's worse than the throw accuracy I get when loading N320 for 9mm.
I've also tried what I will call the "multi-throw average" technique, and what I found is that while I'd still get the single throw variation, but it averaged out about right, and gets better the more throws you average.
Other than that it's a really soft shooting 45 powder, and I've been pretty happy with it.
Testing with my chono and a 1911 showed that at 4.0 grains of regular Clays, using 230 grn MG CMJ's loaded to 1.25 with Winchester Primers, to be a pretty light load, <650 fps. Since then I've upped the load to 4.2 grains, but haven't had a chance to chrono it yet.
Jason
Jason
I'm glad I read your post. It points out that the old adage is "right on". That is, different guns shoot different velocities with the identical loads. Your load would put me over 180 pf. That doesn't make your load good or bad, just different from what works for me. Interesting stuff.
Joe
I load with a RCBS Pro 2000 and did a little experimenting last weekend with my 45. Using clays and weighing each load I found the clays metering +- .2 grain. Switching to Win WST loads varied less than +- .1 grain. I don't throw 10 to 20 loads then weigh and divide....that only dilutes the inaccuracy of the charge weights. When you only want 3.8 grains +- .2 grains is somewhere between 3.6 and 4.0. Big difference in velocity and recoil!!!!!
Edited by holdinsteady, 17 March 2011 - 08:58 PM.
#32
Posted 19 March 2011 - 12:38 PM
#33
Posted 17 January 2012 - 11:56 AM
#34
Posted 22 January 2012 - 06:53 AM
#35
Posted 23 January 2012 - 04:28 PM
#36
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:18 PM
#37
Posted 25 January 2012 - 03:06 PM
#38
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:57 PM
What kind of variances do you see when the lock-out stops the press?
#39
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:49 PM
#40
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:58 PM
#41
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:44 PM
#42
Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:34 AM
I tried the SWC at 1.265 and had several more FTF. I then loaded up some Berrys 230RN to 1.270 and they worked perfectly. I will try loading the SWC to 1.275 but I will wait for my case gauge to arrive before I try again. BTW the SWC loaded to 1.265 also FTF in a friends Springfield 1911 so I guess going long will be my last shot with those.
Have you checked your crimp? When I started loading lead and coated SWC for my SS, I had a LOT of FTF, they were 3 point jams. At least three things helped me resolve the issue, A: sorting out R-P brass (and other lower quality brass) to be used only for range, B: using a wilson cartridge gage to check ALL my match loads, and C: settling on a crimp of .4695 to .470, this had the most impact on reducing FTF in my 1911s.
Edited by GregJ, 13 February 2012 - 11:36 AM.
USPSA A72727
IDPA A45667
#43
Posted 05 November 2012 - 02:48 PM
Paul
#44
Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:19 AM
Mike
#45
Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:13 PM
#46
Posted 16 November 2012 - 05:07 AM
#47
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:26 AM
#48
Posted 05 January 2013 - 08:32 AM
#49
Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:51 AM
I'm seeing variations with it on my 550B - sometimes as much as 0.2gr which concerns me as I'm going for 4.3gr and sometimes the scale shows 4.5 - put it back in case, tare scale, weigh again, sometimes will show 4.3 but other times shows 4.4 to 4.5gr. Faulty Hornady Scale? Cost $30.
I am seeing the same results in my 550B. but, most electronic scales have +/- 0.2gr tolerance. best to use a beam scale to check
#50
Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:55 AM
You don't need a case gauge, you already have the one you should use. Your Barrel !!! Take it out and use it.
Steve Alexander
1 user(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
cuzinvinny











