Low carb horror story what happened to me
#1
Posted 01 March 2004 - 08:21 PM
Well when you:
1. Low carb+
2. High intensity workouts+
3. Pre-existing scar tissue in the hamstring
4. = torn hamstring
You have to have carbs for proper muscle contractions and I wasn't geting enough and add that to the fact my right hamstring muscle fibers were already prone to misfiring due to the scar tissue and you get me out of the game form 6 weeks to 6 months. My left hamstring is ready to go too an I had no idea.
Hard running on my leg workout day was a big no-no too.
low carb is fine but if you work out like an athlete then you need the carbs.
If you will only do what you've always done, you'll only get what you've always gotten.
#2
Posted 01 March 2004 - 08:26 PM
#3
Posted 01 March 2004 - 09:01 PM
The more I read about the "low carb" thing the more I am convinced that it is a very individual thing. I will say that I have more trouble keeping my weight down now that I am off of the "low carb" diet, plus my Cholesterol is worse. The "low carb" diet did help me but because of the amount of protein and diabetes, I got permanent kidney damage. Thanks again. Good & Safe Shooting - JC
#4
Posted 01 March 2004 - 09:26 PM
Since I'm considering doing the low carb thing again --- how low carb did you go?
The last time I started it, I adapted the diet to make most of the protein lean (i.e. I was eating lots of Chicken and lean pork) and I never stopped eating carbs. My carbs during induction were limited to All the salad I could eat at lunch with either a can of Tuna or an equivalent amount of chicken or pork, and several servings of fresh steamed vegetables for dinner with more chicken breast. No bread, pastries, cake, potatoes, rice, pasta. 2 teaspoons of sugar daily for my two mugs of coffee. (I tried eliminating sugar alltogether, but found I couldn't tolerate the coffee without it...)
After the first two weeks I added the occasional (maybe twice a week) serving of potatoes or pasta. I dumped six inches off my waist over six months --- along with about 45 lbs. although I was working out at the time and building muscles...
The older I get, the more I want to avoid injury...
You're shooting Steel like an A class shooter. Why are you shooting the Paper so slowly? ---- Dave Marques, Production Nationals, 2005
This is a game of high-speed precision. If you don't precisely plan what you want to happen, there's not much chance that it will. ---- Brian Enos, 2004
#5
Posted 02 March 2004 - 12:41 AM
It much better to eat proper meal and EXERCISE. You don't need to kill yourself exercising either. Going hard will force your body to use glucose. Just take it easy but go longer, that will burn more fat than going hard.
#6
Posted 02 March 2004 - 04:58 AM
#7
Posted 02 March 2004 - 08:12 AM
Mike
#8
Posted 02 March 2004 - 08:19 AM
(I really have to change my signiture as this new medication they have me on is making me feel lethargic)
#9
Posted 02 March 2004 - 08:44 AM
Whole wheat pasta is usually just as processed as white pasta is. You need to get pasta that isnt processed as much. i cant think of the name right now. THe best Glycemic book I read was the one by Dr. Weil about healthy eating(forgot the title). his stuff is very informative.
#10
Posted 02 March 2004 - 09:36 AM
I have no doubt that it contributed to my present heart problems IHSS+mitral valve regurgitation. I was sick off and on for over a year after going off the diet. My doc says he figures since I was 15 I've lost 4200 pounds. )
I started the Atkins diet on September 1, ended December 24th. Lost 55 lbs.
I've gained two pounds. I'm starting again today, will get off the first of June. I'm hoping that limiting myself to three months on, two months maintenance, I'll avoid any large problems. Only problem I had this time was headaches about the end of the second week. Only lasted a couple of days, though.
Thanks for the input on the training/low carb problems, you may have saved me from a mistake.
#11
Posted 02 March 2004 - 09:45 AM
I keep my diebetes pretty much under control but really have problem with hypoglycema. At a match this past Sunday I had to take Glucose tablets after the 2nd stage.
Diabetes or not, I am still a believer in eating right and finding the excercise program (aerobic) that works for each individual. Diet + Exercise = Fitness + Healthy Immune System.
Thanks again. Good & Safe Shooting - JC
#12
Posted 02 March 2004 - 09:50 AM
The most "basic" reason that the diets work is.
slower metabolism of whole grains/easy metabolism of processed grains=higher insulin production with faster absorbtion. Smaller particles or liquid are absorbed faster.
Eating a good fat or protien with carbs slows down the metabolism of the carbs.
Eating bad (processed) carbs caused an insulin spike which causes hunger when it returns to normal.
There seems to be a relationship between fiber and cholestrol in that more fiber causes less cholestrol in the blood.
BTW Dr Agatston (South Beach) is not a diet doctor, he is a cardiologist.
My person experience may not = yours, but I found it easier to lose a bunch of weight on Atkins, and easier to maintain on S.B. You can lose weight, but at a more "normal" rate.
I am not an expert, and my facts/reasoning are from a lay perspective from the material that I have read. No warantee's expressed or implied......
Mike
#13
Posted 02 March 2004 - 10:11 AM
A trainer at my old gym actually used himself as a guinea pig and did some real testing. He lost as much muscle weight as he did fat weight. Not good. Which would explain why Atkins makes you more injury prone.
Quote
#14
Posted 02 March 2004 - 11:47 AM
Understanding Binary is as easy as 1-10-11.
I'm SiG Lady and I approve of this forum.
... .. --. .-.. .- -.. -.--
If you're a product vendor, YOU belong in our Dealers Forum...!
E-mail the SiG Lady about a custom-created ad banner display!
"It's difficult to remember something you didn't think about." ---Brian Enos
"I have learned from my mistakes, but I have learned even more from others' mistakes." ---CGT80
#15
Posted 02 March 2004 - 11:59 AM
Just something else to consider.
#16
Posted 02 March 2004 - 12:44 PM
#17
Posted 02 March 2004 - 01:22 PM
Carbs not burned are stored as (Triglicrides) fat on our bodies. They do not increase LDL or raise HDL. Food consumtion only accounts for 20% of our total cholesterol. Adkins somehow raised my HDL whereas before, I only knew that "strength training" would raise HDL.
I need to check out the references that you folks have provided. Personally I have a severe obsession with eating at night. May be compusive but I am told that my diabetes contributes to that. But, I have talked to a lot of people who do not have diabetes and they too have night cravings. Really don't know the cause but I do know that for me, I really have to "gut it out" at night and I know that when I was on the Atkin's, I had hamstring injuries. But again that may be and individual thing. Thanks again to everyone. Good & Safe Shooting - JC
#18
Posted 05 March 2004 - 08:24 PM
My carbs were reduced to about 20% of my overall calorie intake. I've gone back to a 50-60% ratio and my doctor, who is the surgeon for some area college sports teams, said my injury is common with his sprinters and he has seen more a few cases of the injury with athletes on low carb.
Jason,
My hams are quite strong. A muscle imbalance is definately not the issue and a second opinion about the cause of my tear has confirmed it.
A lot of "carbophoebs" have a problem with pasta even though it is only a moderate glycemic index food which is why I don't understand the problem. Just don't eat a huge bowl of it every day.
Cutting some carbs, like the empty junk carbs, is still the way to go to loose weight but only within reason and within the demands we are making on our bodies.
If you will only do what you've always done, you'll only get what you've always gotten.
#19
Posted 04 April 2004 - 05:58 PM
SherlockWV, on Mar 2 2004, 01:22 PM, said:
ketones are formed from the breakdown of (among other things) stored body fat.
glucose is normally the primary source of energy. if you deplete the stored glucose (glucose in muscles, glycogen in the liver) from your body, the next source of fuel that the body will use is muscle. after some loss of muscle, the body resorts to using stored body fat for energy. this is where the ketones appear...stored body fat is broken down to ketones which are used as an energy source. excess ketones will be eliminated in the urine.
ketoacidosis is a problem (primarily) of diabetics and involves more than just elevated ketone levels, mainly very highly elevated glucose levels and an acidic blood pH.
#20
Posted 05 April 2004 - 07:22 AM
If you will only do what you've always done, you'll only get what you've always gotten.
#21
Posted 05 April 2004 - 08:09 AM
#22
Posted 06 April 2004 - 01:38 PM
The Atkins diet is NOT FOR ATHLETES or anyone who works out hard. Not only can muscles only burn carbs the same goes for the brain. Fat is not "burned" it is converted to carbohydrates just like protein when there are no carbs available. The induction phase of the Atkins diet says it all.
If you will only do what you've always done, you'll only get what you've always gotten.
#23
Posted 07 April 2004 - 06:43 AM
also, fat is not exclusively turned into carbohydrates when carb intake is restricted. ketones are formed from the breakdown of fat, and are used as a source of energy throughout the body. the brain and muscles do not depend exclusively on glucose, and can and will adapt to use ketones as an energy source.
i have eaten a low carb diet for some time while regularly lifting weights. i lost a significant amount of weight/fat without having my muscles wither away...my gut got a lot smaller, but my arms/chest/etc did not shrink, and my strength has increased.
#24
Posted 07 April 2004 - 02:45 PM
driver8M3, on Apr 7 2004, 04:43 PM, said:
Quote
That is a erroneous conclusion. Muscle protein will burn initially but then one goes to fat. If you want to get specific one burns blood glucose then muscle glycogen then fat. When a marathoner "hits the wall" he has literally burned all glycogen and is then running on fat only. Not a pleasant experience. That is the point of the induction phase of Atkins: to purge all blood glucose in order to get the fat to be used as an energy source.
Quote
Ketones is Atkins babble and I honestly know nothing about it. As far the brain only able to burn carbs I don't know what to tell you. That is physiology 101. If your right show me where it's not true. I just renewed my certification as a sports trainer and what your saying is the first I ever heard of it including when I got my degree.
Quote
Good for you but your an exception. I could go on for paragraphs about performance eating and the effect of diet, but I don't see the point in it.
If you will only do what you've always done, you'll only get what you've always gotten.
#25
Posted 07 April 2004 - 06:53 PM
Quote
thats EXACTLY what i said a couple of posts back, so we can agree on that.
Quote
actually, muscles primarily use fatty acids at rest for energy. when exercise begins, muscle glycogen becomes the primary source of energy in muscles. as muscle glycogen is depleted, muscles then begin to use blood glucose for energy.
Quote
i assure you atkins did not invent ketones, and it is not babble.
Quote
under NORMAL conditions (normal carb intake), that is true. once the body stores of glucose are depleted and fat is being broken down to be used as an energy source, ketones can be used by the brain as a source of energy. perhaps this is physiology 201. do a web search using brain/ketones/energy and you will see that is correct.
earlier, you said:
Quote
i agree. a serious athlete that is not fat has no use for the atkins diet. the atkins diet is meant to loose fat. if your body fat % is reasonable, i dont see why you would want to be on atkins.

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

